Electronics – Marine How To https://marinehowto.com The go-to site for DIY boat owners featuring in depth, step-by-step articles for repair maintenance & upgrades Mon, 02 Aug 2021 16:47:09 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.3 Raymarine SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng & NMEA 2000 https://marinehowto.com/raymarine-seatalk-1-to-seatalkng-nmea2000/ Wed, 05 Jun 2019 15:48:42 +0000 https://marinehowto.com/?p=15772 Raymarine SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng & NMEA 2000 We get asked this electronics question more than just about any other, from customers who have a perfectly operating SeaTalk 1 network and want to add the SeaTalk 1 data to the NMEA 2000 bus. The article deals specifically with older Raymarine [...]

The post Raymarine SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng & NMEA 2000 appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>

Raymarine SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng & NMEA 2000

We get asked this electronics question more than just about any other, from customers who have a perfectly operating SeaTalk 1 network and want to add the SeaTalk 1 data to the NMEA 2000 bus. The article deals specifically with older Raymarine products that operate on the proprietary SeaTalk 1 network.

The conversion from SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng / NMEA 2000 is actually pretty simple once you have the Raymarine E22158 converter kit:

Site Plug:  The SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng  Converter Kit can be purchased from the MarineHowwTo.com web store. Purchases from our web store help keep this site FREE!

You can purchase the Raymarine SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng  Converter Kit here: Raymarine SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng  Converter Kit (LINK)

What You’ll Need:

  • Raymarine E22158 SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng conversion kit (see image above)
  • A male or female SeaTalkng to NMEA 2000 drop cable:
  • Male SeaTalkng to NMEA 2000 = A06046
  • Female SeaTalkng to NMEA 2000 = A06045

A lot of boat owners don’t realize that Raymarine’s SeaTalkng is essentially NMEA 2000 that is using Raymarine’s proprietary SeaTalkng cables/connectors. Once your SeaTalk 1 data is converted into SeaTalkng / NMEA 2000 the conversion & connection to the rest of the vessels NMEA 2000 bus is much easier.

The SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng converter is actually a small electronic signal converter that has operational software doing the conversion. This converter is not just a busbar or fancy terminals strip, as some have described it. The device below is actually a small processor running software.
WARNING: We have seen a number of individuals physically damage equipment or disable a complete NMEA 2000 system by trying to hard-wire an older SeaTalk 1 network to SeaTalkng or NMEA 2000 networks.

YOU CAN NOT DO THIS!

Getting from SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng / NMEA 2000 requires a proper electronic language conversion.

Connection to a standard NMEA 2000 network will look similar to this:

In the image above we are connecting a customers SeaTalk 1 instruments to an NMEA 2000 Garmin chart plotter. This wiring puts the SeaTalk 1 data onto the NMEA 2000 Garmin chart plotter..

The total cost for this upgrade will run you slightly over $100.00 in order to get your SeaTalk 1 data converted over to NMEA 2000 based electronics.

Important Notes:
#1 If the E22158 converter is used only as a drop device, to port SeaTalk 1 over to NMEA 2000, and is not at the end of a back bone, or in a backbone, you would not use any terminators in the blue ports.

#2 If the E22158 converter is the end of a back bone, as shown here, a blue terminator would be used. Terminators are only used at either end of a back bone! For empty drop ports you can use Raymarine blanking plugs in the SeaTalkng drop ports or NMEA 2000 blanking caps to protect any unused future expansion ports on an NMEA 2000 bus.

#3 IMPORTANT: Only two terminators are allowed per NMEA 2000 network. One terminator at each end of the back-bone. We’ve seen DIY installations using numerous terminators and no, the systems were not working correctly.

#4 If the SeaTalk 1 network was already powered, and you are connecting to an already powered NMEA 2000 network, you’ll need to disconnected the red power feed wire for the SeaTalk 1 network. Having multiple sources of power can create a potential for ground loops, if not wired correctly.

Good luck and happy boating!

Like What You Saw Or Read?
Would you like to see more articles like this? Is so feel free to donate, support the site and keep it growing.
Please DO NOT feel obligated at all. If you like it and want to make a small donation than that’s all I ask.
Your donations help keep the content coming and also help keep it free.

Click the DONATE button below if you would like to make a donation via PayPal.

Donate To Marine How To!

The post Raymarine SeaTalk 1 to SeaTalkng & NMEA 2000 appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>
Programming a Balmar External Voltage Regulator https://marinehowto.com/programming-a-balmar-voltage-regulator/ Wed, 04 Apr 2018 18:48:40 +0000 https://marinehowto.com/?p=14451 Preface This article contains three separate videos that show how to physically program Balmar regulators. The videos are meant to be watched in conjunction with reading this article so the misconceptions and misunderstandings I have identified over the years, regarding these regulators, can be explained with a bit more depth. [...]

The post Programming a Balmar External Voltage Regulator appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>

Preface

This article contains three separate videos that show how to physically program Balmar regulators. The videos are meant to be watched in conjunction with reading this article so the misconceptions and misunderstandings I have identified over the years, regarding these regulators, can be explained with a bit more depth.

MarineHowTo.com Plug:
This free web site relies 100% on donations and purchases made through our Web Store (LINK)

We are also an alternator manufacturer and a Balmar dealer.  If you read this article, then buy your parts elsewhere, it makes it tough for us to survive and continue to give this level of detail. Want to see MarineHowTo.co survive? The please do your part to support us!

Purchase Alternators & Regulators (LINK)

UPDATE: Since this article was written Balmar’s new MC-618 regulator has been launched. The new MC-618 allows programming via the screen on the Balmar SG-200 battery monitor or via the SG-200’s Bluetooth App. It can also be programmed the same way as this article describes.

The Magnetic Reed Switch

For years I’ve listened to customers express concerns about “how difficult it is to program the Balmar regulator“, and I don’t necessarily disagree with this, especially if you’re a DIY or one who does not do this on a regular basis. Even for myself I can find programming a customers, already installed, Balmar regulator a bit tedious.

This article will help:

  • Give you higher a comfort level in programming these regulators
  • Clear up some of the confusing language in the owners manual
  • Provide you with a “Regulator Programming Cheat Sheet
  • Discuss best practices for programming & installing these regulators
  • Provide tech tips that will make the process easier.

This article features the Balmar MC-614H but programming & features are similar for the Balmar ARS-5H.

IMAGE: Pictured here is the Balmar MC-614’s magnetic reed switch location, as identified by the red dot.

Definitions: The Balmar owners manuals covers what the LED screen codes mean such as A1C, FFL, AGL etc. etc.. There is no need for us to repeat what is already in the manual in terms of what the numbers/letters are telling you, unless we believe them to be confusing. We have addressed the most commonly confusing parts of the manual, based on years of supporting these regulators, in the article. Please familiarize yourself with the owners manual before reading this article. With the manual and this article it will make more sense.

MC-614 Owners Manual .pdf Download

Why Choose a Balmar Regulator?

Why do I prefer to use the Balmar regulators vs. the other external regulators that are out there? FEATURES! There is no other external voltage regulator, other than DIYing your own, that compares feature for feature with the Balmar regulator. Balmar also delivers excellent customer service and tech-support where humans, that actually know something, answer the phones.

Reliability:

Despite what you you may read on the internet, even by me, because I had an early failure of an ARS-4 & experienced a few others too, these regulators today are very reliable. Over the last 11+ years and many hundreds of regulators I’ve had one regulator with a bad reed-switch (replaced immediately) and one the customer claimed was faulty, but when sent back, was in perfect operational order. Due to changes made over the years to improve reliability, this regulator underwent a full suite of testing, and I got a report from CDI/Balmar. This level of testing was done because these failures are now so rare.

Early on there were some failures of ARS-4’s and some MC-612’s but changes were made to make them more reliable in the move to the current generation. Since CDI Electronics purchased Balmar they have been even further refined for the ultimate in reliability.  I’ve not experienced a single regulator failure under the new CDI/Balmar ownership.

Programming & Control:

In today’s day and age there is simply no excuse for any DC charging product that uses “dip-switch” type programming. By dip-switch I mean programming that utilizes a typical three setting;  AGM, FLOODED or GEL setting. DC charging products like this, in today’s day and age, are simply antiquated tube TV era products. They really have no place being sold in this century other than to pick your pocket. Please do your best to avoid “dip-switch” set battery chargers, solar charge controllers and external voltage regulators that do not allow you to have full-control over your charge settings.

There are no commercially available external regulators, at this price point, that allow you the same level of programming & control that a Balmar does.

  • Base Battery Type
  • Belt Load Manager (can also be used for current limiting an alternator)
  • Display Mode
  • Alternator Failure Advisory
  • Regulator Field Start Delay
  • High Voltage Limit
  • Compensation Limit
  • Bulk Voltage Limit
  • Bulk Time/Duration
  • Absorption Voltage Limit
  • Absorption Time/Duration
  • Float Voltage Limit
  • Float Time/Duration
  • Low Voltage Limit
  • Field Threshold % Bulk to Absorption
  • Field Threshold % Float to Re-Absorption
  • Alternator Temperature Threshold Limit
  • Battery Temperature Threshold Limit
  • Battery Compensation Slope Voltage Correction

The majority of the programming features above are non-existent on other external regulators.

Regulator Installation Best Practices

Balmar regulators use an epoxy potting to keep the regulators printed-circuit-board clean, dry & free from corrosion. Placing it in high-heat areas can increase the risk of the epoxy potting to crack, as shown. I prefer to see a maximum working temp of below 140F, but Balmar claims the regulator can now handle 194F with the newest potting epoxy revision.

The regulator in the image above was installed by a boat yard, yet it was installed in the engine bay and only inches from the exhaust riser & manifold. The high heat and rapid temp changes caused the epoxy potting, which makes the regulator highly water resistant, to crack. The cracks in the epoxy likely causing one of the traces or components on the PC board to fail.

This regulator was also located near the engines siphon-break and had some corrosion starting on the terminals. This regulator was replaced and relocated outside the engine bay. After replacing it we ran the boat for other purposes and I noted a surface temp where the regulator used be of 208F. This failure is not a result of the regulator but rather a very poorly chosen installation location.

Regulator Installation Worst Practices:

  • Avoid installing the regulator in the engine bay unless yours runs pretty cool
  • Do not install the regulator in a hot compartment or against the inside of a dark colored hull
  • *Do not wire regulator negative to the back of the alternator
  • *Do not wire voltage sense to the back of the alternator
  • Do not just set a battery type and walk away
  • Do not forget proper over-current protection / fusing
  • Do not clean the epoxy potting with any solvents
  • Do not use Velcro to affix your regulator to the vessel, there are four screw holes for a reason

Regulator Installation Best Practices

  • Install the regulator in a cool & dry location, quite often this will be outside the engine bay
  • *Wire positive & negative voltage sensing directly to the battery being charged or as close as possible
  • Always use the advanced programming menu to get an optimal set up
  • Always program the alternator specifically for your batteries
  • Program the regulator at home rather than once installed, it give you much better control
  • Always use the optional battery temp and alternator temp sensors (MC-614H offers two battery temp sensors!)
  • If you need to extend the wiring harness make one yourself rather than adding onto the factory harness with hidden splices
  • Always program your regulator to avoid dropping to float too early. I call this “premature floatulation
  • Always use proper crimp tools & terminals
  • Always use over-current protection on any positive feed to the regulator Reg B+/red, #9 / v-sense and Brown / ignition
  • Try to mount the regulator in a vertical orientation
  • Maintain a decent distance from RF noise emitters such as the alternator itself, inverters, chargers etc.
  • Allow for adequate air flow around the regulator
  • Use the Balmar supplied magnetic screwdriver, it has the correct magnet strength for the reed switch.

*Please read this sister article on proper voltage sensing for the best charging performance.

Alternators & Voltage Sensing – Why It Matters

Installation Location

Over the years Balmar has had some varying advice on where to best install the regulator. This particular manual for an MC-614 (see image) says to avoid engine bays due to high heat. I tend to agree with this particular manual, unless your engine bay runs cool and is well ventilated.

The MarineHowTo.com Regulator Programming Cheat Sheet

*Click on image to enlarge

In order to help make the job of programming a Balmar regulator easier, MHT created a programming cheat sheet just for this purpose. This .pdf file allows you to print it, then go through each setting before hand. You simply choose what you want to change/set and enter it into the cheat sheet before you start programming. The cheat sheet follows the MC-614’s scrolling menu.

TIP: When you’re all done programming the regulator, please save your programmed settings by inserting the “programming cheat sheet” into your on-board owners manual. Now any service tech that gets on board will know exactly how your regulator is programmed. They will really appreciate this information and it may just save you a lot of time and money.

IMPORTANT: Please purchase batteries from manufacturers who can provide you with all the parameters necessary for proper programming.

This is a free printable .pdf download:

Regulator Programming Cheat Sheet Download – Click Here

Custom Cheat Sheets:

If you would like us to create a custom cheat-sheet for you, the flat fee is $65.00. Before you contact us please read the following;

1- We only do custom cheat sheets for genuine branded batteries such as Lifeline, Trojan, US Battery, Northstar, Odyssey, Crown, Deka/East Penn, Rolls, Fullriver etc.. We do not make cheat sheets for batteries sold by “sticker application companies” such as auto-parts stores, West Marine, Costco, or cheaply made off-shore batteries such as Renogy or most any non USA made battery sold on Amazon. If the sticker on your battery is not an actual physical battery manufacturer, please do not contact us for a cheat sheet.

2- We DO NOT make custom cheat sheets for LiFePO4.

3- You must provide us with a complete description of how you use the boat, daily Ah consumption, all charging equipment including brand, make, model and amperage. Also, if you have an externally regulated alternator we will need to know what belt you are driving the alternator with and the amperage of the alternator.

Regulator Cheat Sheet Example

*Click on image to enlarge

In this image, and downloadable .pdf, we have an example of a regulator cheat sheet all filled out and ready to program the alternator for a GEL battery. This is simply an illustrative example of what a filled out programming cheat sheet might look like.

Regulator Programming Cheat Sheet Example Download

Why is Belt Load Manager a Tremendous Feature?

Belt Load Manager, formerly known as Amp Manager, is a feature unique to the Balmar family of regulators and is built into both the MC-614 and ARS-5. It is programmed using bEL in the regulator programming menu. I know of no other external regulator, other than Wakespeed, that offers any way to limit the alternators current output to accommodate a belt limit situation or to reduce the chances of the alternator from over-heating.

Lets use this alternator as an example:

This owner replaced his 80A factory alternator with a 110A Balmar, only his existing regulator was not a Balmar, but rather a an older Xantrex/Heart Interface. This was a very bad idea. The old Xantrex regulator, like most others out there, had no way to limit the alternators amperage output to better match the v-belts capabilities. The belt on this engine was a 1/2″ or 13MM single v-belt, the standard belt for this engine. Using the factory 80A alternator belt dust was tolerable but two factory alternators burned up trying to feed the massive bank of AGM batteries so the owner sought higher performance.

Once the owner switched to the 110A Balmar alternator he began chewing up alternator belts at a rate of one belt for every 16-22 hours of engine run time. Wow!!!! The belt dust was literally choking everything including the alternator. Alignment was spot on, pulleys were clean and rust/corrosion free and the belt wrap on the alternator pulley was actually quite decent too. The problem was simple, he was just overloading the belt and had no way to limit this issue other than dual v-belts $$$$, a serpentine pulley kit $$$$, or a better designed regulator $$. The owner chose a Balmar regulator and belt manager was set to level 5. Belt dust was nearly eliminated and he went three years on the next belt. Ideally this situation required dual v-pulleys, or a multi-rib / serpentine kit, but with the Balmar regulator and Belt Load Manager, he was able to make it work and at a much lower cost than a pulley conversion.

IMPORTANT: Just because you purchase a 100A alternator don’t be fooled into thinking this is its maximum output. When cold a typical performance based small case alt can pump out 5%-15% more than its face value cold rating or 105A to 115A +, for short duration’s, even with a 100A rated alternator. Some brands will deliver more than 20% over the rating when cold. This overage, even for short duration’s, wreaks havoc on belts. Only Balmar regulators offer the Belt Load Manager feature.

Belt Load Manager can be used to solve two important issues:

#1 Limit an alternators output to better match the v-belts HP drive capabilities.

#2 Limit an alternators output in high demand/long bulk situations to allow longer alternator life by running it at less than “full bore/full output”. Contrary to popular misconception I know of not a single small case alternator that can be run at full output for hours on end, unless;

  1. The rectifier has been removed and the unit is rectified remotely
  2. It uses liquid cooling
  3. You are directly force feeding it ice cold air while also exhausting the hot air

For example, if your desire a hot alternator output of 85A – 100A then you would ideally want to purchase a 120A or larger small case alternator and use Belt Load Manager in order to limit the alternator output to your target amperage. Sizing this way keeps your alt running cooler and keeps it within its safe operating envelope, in regards to a safe working temperature.  Again, only Balmar regulators have the capability to limit the alternators field potential.

IMPORTANT: Small frame / small case alternators, even those sold as high performance, are NOT CONSTANT-DUTY RATED.

Don’t be fooled by less expensive regulators which lack features and lack the programming the Balmar regulators have.

Belt Load Manager Misunderstandings?

Below is a direct quote from the Balmar manual:

“The MC-614 provides the ability to manage regulator field potential, making it possible to govern the horsepower loads placed on the drive belt(s) by the alternator. The Belt Load Manager can also be used to protect the alternator from extraordinary load created by a battery load that’s too large for the alternator’s capacity.”

I have highlighted the words “field potential” for a reason and that reason is because Belt Load Manager (BLM), and how it actually works, is very often misunderstood.

Each step in BLM results in a 5% reduction off the maximum available field potential (click the image to enlarge it). It’s important to understand that BLM is not a 5% reduction in amperage output on a 100A alternator, or a 20% reduction in output for a 150A alternator making the 100A a 95A alternator and the 150A alternator a 120A alternator. This is not how it works, but it’s how many folks assume it works.

What is Often Assumed or Misunderstood

*100A Rated Alternator

BLM #1 = 95A Alternator

BLM #2 = 90A Alternator

BLM #3 = 85A Alternator

BLM #4 = 80A Alternator

BLM #5 = 75A Alternator

*100A alternator used as example only

The reality is this is not how BLM works. We have RPM, rotor core resistance, battery voltage, cold alternator windings and hot alternator windings etc. all playing a role in its overall output and field demand.

As an overly simplified example, consider BLM this way;

If your alternators field could pull max of 6A, at a given RPM, field voltage & stator/rotor temp, and you then set the regulator to BLM #1, the field potential (field voltage), the alternator could see, based on all the previous criteria, is reduced by 5%.  This 5% reduction, in avaible field voltage, would result in less than 6A driving the rotor.

What is “Field Potential”?

Field potential, for a Balmar regulator, is battery voltage (sensed voltage) minus about a 0.4V to 0.5V drop across the regulator FET’s. So a battery voltage of 13.5V, during bulk charging as voltage is climbing, results in a field potential of about 13.0V to 13.1V. If we follow Ohm’s law, voltage is what drives our current, and the same is true into a alternators rotor. BLM reduces the available field voltage, measured after the FET’s, by 5% for each step. If we reduce field voltage (field potential) we also reduce field current and alternator output *generally goes down.

*Generally - Occasionally a single BLM step will not reduce output because the regulator is slightly over-driving the rotor to begin with.

Keep in mind that if you set up belt manager, into a hot alternator,  it will still produce more current when it is cold. If you set it up at a low RPM it will be different than at a high RPM.

Bottom line is that BLM is a reduction in the avaible field potential (field voltage) not a reduction in alternator output based on it’s “rated output”.

There are a few ways you can program this:

  •      Reduce BLM in steps, over a few week period, with good solid runs in-between that would be sufficient to generate belt dust. Reduce BLM until you no longer have belt dust or you are no longer bouncing in and out of alternator temp limiting.
  •     Beg borrow or steal an inverter that can load your alternator to its maximum output and set your engine at cruise RPM. Now use a DC clamp meter or other ammeter to measure alternator output amperage. While the engine is running reduce BLM until you are at your desired maximum output at cruise RPM. It will still be higher when the alt is cold but not for very long. If concerned about cold start load, reduce BLM by one more step.

Belt Load Manager is just PWMing (pulse width modulating) the field output during periods that would otherwise result in 100% regulator field output.

Program The Regulator Off the Boat

One of the easiest ways to program a Balmar regulator is at home, with a 12V source. It is simple, and requires only 4 wires for the MC-614, or 3 wires for the ARS-5. You’ll also want a fuse or fuses to do so this safely. In this image I’m using a small 12V GEL battery. I use this battery for testing mast wiring during spring commissioning. I have added a fuse block and three fuses; Ignition, Regulator B+ and regulator Volt-Sense plus the yellow regulator B-/Negative lead.

Programming the regulator, in comfort, is much easier, less stressful and you can easily double or triple check your work all while not having a hose-clamp tail piercing your backside. I pre-program every single Balmar regulator I install, here in the shop, before I even get to the boat.

Required Connections for Bench Top Programming:

Regulator B-/Negative – Yellow or Black Wire Terminal #1

Regulator B+/Power – Red Wire Terminal #2

Ignition / Brown Wire Terminal #3

*Voltage Sensing – Terminal #9 (*MC-614 only ARS-5 does not have a terminal #9)

IMPORTANT: Battery or source voltage must be at a minimum of 12.5V in order to program the regulator & have the changes save.

TECH TIP: Please fuse all positive wires (+ volt-sense, B+ & Ignition). Hooking the regulator up backwards, without fuses, can destroy it.

Programming The Base Battery Type

It is best to tackle the programming in three distinct steps with battery type being first:

1- Program the base battery type; bA

2- Program the next three settings of the hierarchical menu; bEL, dSP & bDL

3- Program the Advanced Settings

In the first video the MC-614 is programmed for the base battery type or bA:

The reason for programming the base battery type first is to prevent confusion down the road.  Let’s assume you left the regulator programmed to UFP or “Universal Factory Program” but then went in and created a full custom charge profile, in the Advanced Settings menu for your GEL batteries. The first thing a tech will do, when there is an issue, is to look at the UFP setting, then look at your GEL bank, and change the battery type to GEL. They may do this despite the fact that you have proactively changed the GEL or AGM or FDC settings in Advanced Programming, to exactly match your brand & type of battery. Correctly setting the battery type just prevents confusion.

The Programming Hierarchical Menu

The menu you see in this image represents the top line menu items that you’ll scroll through to program the regulator. Each hierarchical menu item is a gateway to change what that top-line menu represents.

TECH TIP: You do not need to go through each step each time. For example, if you made a mistake setting Belt Load Manager or bEL, but everything else is correct, release the magnet after “PRO” appears, then re-touch at bEL to set or change Belt Load Manager. Once you’ve fixed bEL just let the display scroll three times until you see SAU, which means SAV or SAVE, you’re now all set.

Hierarchical Menu In Scroll Order

bA = Set Battery Type –  The gateway to set battery type eg; AGM, GEL, FLOODED etc.

bEL = Set Belt Load Manger Percentage – The gateway to set BLM eg: level 4 is a 20% reduction in field potential

dSP = Set Display Mode – Two choices, long display or short display

bDL = Alternator Failure Advisory – Two choices ON or OFF

  = Advanced Programming – The gateway into advanced regulator Programming which features 15 customizable parameters

This second video examines the hierarchical menu of the MC-614 Regulator:

The third video show how to use Advanced Programming

TECH TIP: For batteries such as LiFePO4 you may find it necessary to reduce the bv setting below the default low of 14.1V. When using the regulators menu in scroll-order this is not possible because Av is set to 14.0V and each step must be 0.1V apart. There is however a work-around for this.

If  you wanted to set bv to  13.9V & Av to 13.8V you would need to reduce Fv first, then Av and then you can reduce bv. Each constant-voltage stage, bv, Av or Fv, needs to be programmed with a 0.1V spread. In other words bv can not be set lower than Av or Fv. The work-around is simple, just start backwards by reducing Fv first, then reduce Av then set bv last. Now you can drop the bv, Av & Fv target voltages lower than the factory defaults allow for.

bv = Bulk Target Voltage

Av = Absorption Voltage

Fv = Float Voltage

Confusion Creates Communication Issues

“RC I am fed up with this piece-o-crap alternator.It is in “bulk” and this damn thing is only putting out 20A. How can I send it in for repair?”

The above quote is a typical day in my world. Because the manual and charge lingo Balmar has chosen are confusing at best, trouble shooting time is burned up over perceived issues that are not real all due to semantics.

This all really boils down to two things.

1- Boaters generally understand that “bulk charging” means maximum output from the alternator.

2- Balmar calls a constant-voltage or voltage limited stage of charging “bulk voltage”.

Once voltage is maintained at a constant limit by the voltage regulator ACCEPTED CURRENT DECREASES. Once at constant voltage “bv – bulk voltage” the alternator is not at maximum output. The Balmar charging graph above, and on the right side, has been edited to show what really happens before we attain bv or “bulk voltage”.

Balmar only shows two things happening before constant voltage;

START DELAY

SOFT RAMP

In reality it’s really;

START DELAY – In this stage the regulator is applying 0% field to allow oil for circulation in the engine

SOFT RAMP – In this stage, a max of about 2 minutes, the field (regulator blue wire) is gradually ramped up to the maximum so as not to “slam” the engine with a huge load all at once.

*BULK CHARGING – During bulk charging the alternator is delivering everything it can, in current, to the battery bank. This can take as little as a few seconds for a bank already at high SOC or as long as multiple hours for a large bank deeply discharged.

*This is essentially an entire stage of charging (bulk stage) that Balmar left out of the graph. It is part of what leads to the confusion.

Understanding Battery Charging Lingo

The marine charging equipment industry apparently likes to keep customers “confused“, especially on topics surrounding battery charging. I suspect this is because it keeps the mystique of the “complex wizardry“, that goes on inside the product, a big secret?

In the marine industry almost all manufacturers use what is referred to as CC > CV charging, and this includes Balmar. The DIN standard designations for  charging would be I > Uo > U.

CC>CV charging simply means: Constant Current then Constant Voltage

Constant Current = The maximum current the charge source can deliver to the batteries

Constant Voltage = Voltage is held at a constant value by the regulation circuitry

In the rest of the world there’s actually a DIN standards that defines the charging process and it looks like this; I  Uo  U

I = Constant Current, CC, Bulk or sometimes called Boost Charging

Uo = CV/Constant Voltage, Constant Over Voltage, Absorption, Acceptance or sometimes Topping Charge

U = CV/Constant Voltage, Float, Finishing Charge or sometimes Maintenance Charge

It is important to note that under all definitions, whether DIN or the US terminology bulk charging is not governed by voltage being held steady, it is limited only by the charge sources output capability. During bulk charging, using real definitions, not made up definitions by a marketing department, voltage is always rising during bulk charging.

BULK = MAXIMUM CHARGE SOURCE OUTPUT WITH VOLTAGE RISING

RC can an alternator really deliver a constant current?

The answer to this is essentially no unless the alternator and RPM are held perfectly steady and the temp of the alternator stays the same. Despite myself and many others often referring to bulk charging, with an alternator, as “constant current” it’s probably better described as the alternators maximum current potential.

An alternator is affected by many things that a typical fixed-current battery charger is not. An alternator needs a maximum RPM to deliver it’s maximum current output. As an alternator heats up its winding’s lose efficiency and it’s current capabilities drop off a bit. This is why an alternator, or solar for that matter, is really better described as a maximum current potential charge source during bulk charging.

All maximum current potential means is that the alternator is being driven as hard as it can be, by the regulator, and it’s delivering its maximum current potential based on RPM and temperature. The alternators maximum current potential will vary up and down based on RPM, temp etc. however, it is still bulk charging and voltage will always be climbing towards the constant voltage limit. Because Balmar leaves bulk-charging off of their “stages” chart, and the description in the manual is a bit misleading, it can be quite confusing for the average DIY and even marine techs. Whether you choose to call it; bulk charging, maximum current potential, constant potentialconstant current or “I” it’s really just a matter of preference. In any of these scenarios voltage is ALWAYS RISING to the CONSTANT VOLTAGE limit. It’s far more simple to just call it bulk but some manufacturers have muddied those waters, including Balmar by calling a Constant-Voltage stage “Bulk Voltage”.  Perhaps a better and less confusing term for Balmar’s “Bulk Voltage” stage would be “Absorption 1”, but I digress….

Bottom Line? DURING BULK-CHARGING BATTERY VOLTAGE ALWAYS RISING!

IMAGE = BULK CHARGING: In this image we have a hot 110A small case alternator, held at a steady cruise RPM, and it’s delivering a steady 85A of output (red line). As we can see by looking at the blue line the battery voltage is steadily climbing from the 12.1V it started at (approx 50% SOC) and at the end of BULK-charging it has finally approached the regulators 14.7V Constant voltage limit or the Absorption or Uo stage where voltage will now be held steady by the voltage regulator.

Balmar regulators essentially have two absorption or Uo stages and they are called bV and Av. Balmar’s terminology for BULK CHARGING is “Soft Ramp“… Confused? You should be because it makes little sense based on industry accepted terminology.

Constant Voltage Charging

Now that we have gone over what bulk charging is, it’s also important to know what CV/Constant Voltage charging is.

Constant Voltage = Uo, U, Absorption, Acceptance, Float & Equalization

Absorption Charge

All of the above words are examples of voltage being held steady or a CV stage of charging. DIN separates Absorption from Float by designating absorption as Uo where the “U” means constant voltage and the  “o” means over voltage. The “o” in Uo just means that this CV stage (absorption) can not be held indefinitely or over-charging will result.

The Uo or absorption stage of charging (bv and Av for the Balmar regulators) is one of the most critical charge stages to battery cycle life. The job of the absorption stage is to bring the battery to full charge or very near and to reconvert the lead sulfate, created during discharge, back into active material. The DIN term “U” means Float and lacks the “o” because float can be held for longer periods with minimal risk of over charging.

US Lingo For Three Stage: CC/BULK > CV/ABSORPTION > CV/FLOAT

DIN Lingo for Three Stage: “I”/BULK > “Uo”/ABSORPTION > “U”/FLOAT

To simplify this even more try to consider a voltage regulator as  a VOLTAGE LIMITER. All a voltage regulator is really doing, during CV charging, is limiting to a preset voltage point, once the battery bank has attained the targeted voltage.

IMAGE = ABSORPTION CHARGING: This graph is just a continuation of the charge process started in the previous image. To the left we can see the current still steady at 85A (max alternator current output) but the voltage is climbing up to the pre-programmed voltage limit of 14.7V.

Once the battery bank has attained the voltage limit, in this case 14.7V, the regulator switches / transitions from bulk/max current potential to constant voltage charging where the voltage limit of 14.7V is now held steady by the VR. The voltage regulator is now doing it’s job as a “voltage limiter” instead of just driving the alternator to its maximum potential output.

In the graph you’ll notice that once voltage is held steady the current begins declining. This current decline is simply the result of the relationship between terminal voltage, current & SOC (state of charge). In order for the regulator to hold voltage steady, with a climbing SOC, the current being fed to the battery has to decline or the voltage set point would be over-shot. During absorption charging (bv or Av) the battery is dictating what the current can be so as not to “over-shoot” the 14.7V limit. As the SOC of the battery increases less and less current is needed to not over-shoot the voltage limit.

Key Points:

#1 During bulk charging the amount of current available to a the bank determines the bulk duration.

*High Charge Current = Shorter bulk duration and a CC to CV transition point at a lower state of charge

**Low Charge Current = Longer bulk duration and a CC to CV transition at a higher state of charge

*A Lifeline AGM Battery bank charged at 40% of Ah Capacity (160A for a 400Ah bank) will be bulk charging for around 20 minutes. This means the maximum bulk duration is pretty short, the alternator is only at max potential for about 20 minutes and the rest is CV charging where current is steadily declining.

**If we cut the above charge current in half, and charge the same bank at 20% of Ah capacity (80A for a 400Ah bank), the bulk charging duration lasts about an hour and fifteen minutes. Asking any small-frame/small-case alternator to produce its maximum output for 1:15 is pretty tough and it will develop tremendous heat. This is why Balmar offers Belt Load Manager and an alternator temp sensor. Please use them if you have a large or high acceptance bank.

#2 During absorption/CV charging it is the battery that determines the time it takes to get to 100% SOC. The only way to change this relationship would be to increase the target voltage but most batteries have a reasonable limit as to the maximum target absorption voltage.

Programming Tips to Maximize Your Investment

IMAGE: This image is from a reputable deep cycle battery manufacturer and shows their suggested charge voltages for a 12V battery. The 12V battery at 77F  is highlighted by the blue arrows. Also note the temp compensation they show in this grid. The temp compensation for this brand is all based on a 5mV compensation (per cell) for each 1°C change in battery temp. If your battery manufacturer can’t provide this information, walk away.

Are you charging your deep-cycle batteries at the optimal voltages for a long cycle-life?

The Balmar regulator is an excellent tool for battery charging but sadly far to many of these regulators are not programmed to work as effectively as they can. These tech-tips can help.

TECH TIPS:

1- Small-Frame Alternators are Not Constant Duty – If you have a small frame alternator and a large bank please use Belt Load Manager AND an alternator temp sensor. Your alternator will last much longer when not pushed to it’s maximum every time it is used.

2- Setting Only bA / Battery Type is Inadequate Programming – Setting a base battery type, and walking away, is about as useless as buying a Bugatti Veyron Super Sport and then installing some 1940’s bias-ply whitewall tires.  You’re simply not getting your money’s worth out of the regulator by doing this.

3-  Use Alternator & Battery Temp Sensors – These regulators are not complete until you install the alternator temp sensor MC-TS-A, and the MC-TS-B battery temp sensors. Unless you bank is very small, in relation to the alternator, then an MC-TS-A will be a necessary insurance policy. Every battery manufacturer on the planet prefers temperature compensated battery charging, and most reputable manufactures require it. A Trojan battery that charges at 14.8V at 77F – 80F can not charge at 14.8V at 95F. Without a battery temp sensor you run a much higher risk of cooking your battery and causing accelerated plate erosion.

Battery temp Compensation Slope Adjustments: The battery temp compensation feature on the Balmar regulators is adjusted using the SLP or SLOPE feature  in the advanced programming menu. This allows the regulator to be programmed for exactly the temp correction the battery maker specifies. One area where folks often get confused is in thinking it is only adjustable from 0-8.3 mV per battery. The 0-8.3 mV is per cell and for a 12V regulator this is 6 cells.

In other-words the regulator setting is adjusting temp compensation slope on a per cell basis, in degrees Celsius, not based on 6 cells or a whole battery. If a battery manufacturer wants 0.002 mV per-cell, per-degree C, this would be 0.012V per battery, per degree C change, but the regulator would be set to 0.002 for slope per cell and would compensate the battery at 0.012 mV per degree C change because it knows it is a 12V regulator and automatically multiplies your setting based on 6 cells.

4- Avoid Premature Float – Setting an adequate absorption/CV duration, (time spent at constant voltage), is critically important to battery health. The factory settings of 18 minutes for bv and 18 min Av plus any “calculated” additional time are not going to help you get the most from these regulators. In a perfect world the “calculations” that can extend or shorten the CV time calculations would work perfectly, unfortunately they rarely do, and this is why there is an advanced programming menu. B1C (bv duration) and A1C (Av duration) can be extended or shortened in the advanced programming, and should be in almost every installation other than LiFePO4.

The algorithm for bv and Av works like this: Programmed time completed/elapsed, regulator field percentage below 65% (or what ever you’ve set it too), voltage has been stable for 2 minutes. Once these three criteria have been met the regulator can now move to the next stage. Please bear in mind that the alternator has NO CLUE what percentage of the field is being used to power on-board loads or to charge the battery! This is exactly why you will need to custom program it so you are getting your money’s worth.

As noted above B1C and A1C time settings, % field and voltage stability (why correctly wired volt sensing is critical) must be achieved before the regulator can move to the next stage, and this is most often a good thing. The factory “base battery type” settings allows for the regulator to drop to float far too early, and I say this with nearly 30 years of experience with these regulators as well as using them as teh default regulator on our alternator testing machine here at Compass Marine Inc… Unless you routinely motor for 6+ hours, when out cruising, you should rarely, if ever, see your regulator drop to float. If it is doing this, you can fix this in the advanced settings menu by extending the minimums on the B1C or A1C time clocks and / or adjusting the field percentages that allow a transition. The only parameter that cannot be changed is the voltage stability the reg is also looking for.

I will often set bv at 0.1V over max factory recommended absorption voltage for 6-18 minutes, depending upon battery type, then set Av to the maximum allowable absorption voltage for anywhere from 2 hours to as much as 5+ hours depending upon the bank and available charge current.

On 3/21/18 I capacity tested a 2014 100Ah TPPL AGM battery that has been charged “properly“. Properly defined as a minimum of .4C in charge current (40A for a 100Ah battery) per manufacturer minimum current guidelines. Bulk-voltage bv is set to 14.8V bv for 12 minutes, then to 14.7V Av for 5 hours. This is 5:18 at constant voltage, temp compensated and an alternator float of 13.8V. The other charging equipment on the boat is solar, set similarly but a 2 hour absorption vs. 5 hours (due to the low current), and with float set to 13.4V.

The battery delivered 96.54Ah out of it’s 100Ah rating. A month earlier I tested a 2016 version of the identical battery. It had been charged only by a stock Hitachi alternator only. It delivered 56.83 Ah’s. The correct absorption voltage and a long enough absorption duration matter and can make big differences in bank longevity.

Yes, the Balmar regulators “try” to maximize and deliver a correct constant voltage duration but, in most cases, they fall short and drop to float far too early. The reason for this is simple, all the regulator knows is voltage and % of field drive. Voltage is simple, but the % of field drive actually being used to charge the batteries is nothing more than a crap-shoot guess for the regulator. What I mean by this is the regulator only knows a voltage, as sensed by regulator + sense and regulator B-, and the percentage of field output. What if 60% of that field output was being used for a water-maker, refrigeration, inverter, or other house loads? What if there were no house loads on at all? What if they turn on and off throughout the charge cycle? You can spend lots of time messing with field percentages but they change and you may not be happy with the results.. The easiest way around premature float is to extend the constant voltage time parameters in either b1c or A1c.

“So what’s the bottom line?”

If your regulator is dropping to float before the batteries are accepting less than 1% – 2% of Ah capacity, at ABSORPTION voltage (NOT float) then it is dropping to float too early. Most AGM’s are between 0.5% of Ah capacity (Lifeline) and 0.3% (Odyssey, East Penn/ Deka etc.) of Ah capacity to use tail current as when to drop to float.. Control this via b1C or A1c or field percentages, if you decide to experiment with field percentage. Extending the A1c duration is generally the easiest method.

Charging Batteries Correctly is Critical

5 – Set Yourself Up For PSOC Success – Using the highest absorption voltage the battery maker allows for will result in the least PSOC (Partial State of Charge) damage to the battery. Even the fastest charging AGM batteries require approximately 5.5+ hours to go from 50% DOD to 100% SOC, and this is in lab conditions with no chance of premature float and with 20% to 40% of Ah capacity in charging current. Flooded & GEL batteries charge even slower so absorption times will need to be adjusted to suit the batteries. The worst efficiencies for charging are from 85% SOC to 100% SOC and this duration alone, the last 15%, even with AGM batteries, often takes 3 – 6+ hours depending upon battery state of health. In the ideal set up your batteries don’t drop to float until they are 100% full. With voltage regulated charging this is tough but we can certainly do better because the MC-614 and ARS-5 regulators can be programmed eight ways from Sunday with ample opportunity to minimize premature-floatulation.

6 – Over Charging Concerns – If you’re concerned about “over-charging” when you leave the dock “fully charged“, which is really more of a personal problem rather than a real problem, simply install a dash switch that interrupts the regulators brown wire or ignition feed to shut it down. If you want to further complicate a relative non-issue you can use a resistor in the battery-temp compensation circuit to trick the regulator into a lower voltage by making it think the battery is hot. I call this trick “switch triggered float”..

I’ve autopsied piles and piles of batteries, both sealed and non-sealed, and the number of “dried-out” VRLA batteries (GEL or AGM) I have seen have been an n=2 banks. Both of these banks were ruined by controller-less solar systems (no charge controller at all) pushing 15+V every day. These batteries were not ruined by voltage regulated alternators leaving the dock at 100% SOC. By far and away the biggest concern with marine batteries is chronic under charging. The Balmar regulators can be programmed to help you avoid this.

7- Utilize Balmar’s Advanced Programming Menu – If you’re not taking advantage of the advanced programming features, ones you’ve actually paid for,  you’re really only seeing a marginal, if any, gain in actual charging performance.

8- Wire the Voltage Regulator Correctly – I hear lots of belly-aching over short bulk charging. In every single case of this I find the voltage sensing circuit wired INCORRECTLY. In regards to charging performance, even the Balmar manual is incorrect on how to properly wire voltage sensing. This article cannot be over-looked: Alternators and Voltage Sensing – Why it Matters

9- Field % Transition Thresholds – For a DIY, with not a lot of electrical experience, I generally advise extending b1c and A1c time clocks and leaving the Field Percent Transition Thresholds, FbA (Bulk to absorption) and FFL (from float back to absorption) alone. However, please don’t take this as a blanket statement and don’t be afraid to experiment with the field transition percentages. They are easy to re-set to the factory default, if what you changed does not work.

The difficulty with field percentage transition thresholds is the regulator has no idea what percentage of the field is being used for charging the batteries and what percent of field is being used to power on-board house loads. It is, after-all, a voltage regulator not a current regulator. If your house loads are very predictable, you can easily get the field transitions to work well, but it may take some experimenting and time to dial it in just right. If you run large inverters while under way or have unpredictable loads, while charging, it may be tougher, but please don’t be afraid to experiment with it.

10- It’s All About the Correct Voltages – For years the flooded deep cycle battery industry was stuck in the dark ages as to how to correctly charge lead acid batteries that were used in a PSOC environment. This is because industry and stationary systems require slightly different charge profiles than do PSOC use situations. Today, thanks to folks like Tom Hund (retired), of Sandia National Laboratories Photovoltaic Department, we now know that in order to correctly charge deep cycle flooded batteries we need significantly more terminal voltage during absorption than the antiquated 14.1V to 14.4V old-school guidance used to suggest.

Sadly no-one has keyed in the majority marine charge equipment manufacturer’s about this “breakthrough” information. In their defense, we’ve only known this for 20 or so years. (grin) With a Balmar regulator you can program to your hearts content and get it right.

If you’re not charging deep-cycle flooded batteries at 14.6V (bare minimum) to 15.0V, for PSoC use (boats, RV’s or off-grid solar), they’re simply not getting properly charged. Even many AGM batteries are capable of being charged as high as 14.7V and their health is vastly improved by doing so. With all that said, use your battery manufactures recommended voltages but stick to the maximum of the safe-range not the low side. For example if your battery maker suggests an absorption setting of 14.4V to 14.8V you’ll want to be at 14.8V end of the spectrum not at the 14.4V end.

Proper Programming, It’s Your Choice

IMAGE: Pictured here is a typical automotive voltage regulator the type found on most marine engines as they ship from the factory. I busted it open and extracted all the potting material so you could see the difference. With this image it is easy to understand why an external regulator, with all the features the Balmar’s offer, can lead to better and healthier charging for deeply cycle batteries and to better protection for the hard working alternator.

In the end it is your boat, and you’ll need to decide how you want to program your regulator, for your own piece of mind. All I can say, as a marine energy management specialist, is that I find far too many external regulators inadequately programmed & wired for the owners to be “getting their money’s worth”. Get your money’s worth and venture into the advanced settings!

SITE PLUG: Please keep in mind that MarineHowTo.com is a 100% FREE SITE with no paid advertisers. This site is 100% reader supported through donations, by the hand-full of products manufactured by Compass Marine Inc. and by products I like, use or can stand behind and add to the store.

All of the products sold to support the web site can be found in the;

MarineHowTo.com Web Store

Please do your best to support this site by making your purchases here. If you don’t see it, just ask; compassmarineservices AT gmail DOT com

Happy boating!

Like What You Saw Or Read?
Would you like to see more articles like this? Is so feel free to donate, support the site and keep it growing.
Please DO NOT feel obligated at all. If you like it and want to make a small donation than that’s all I ask.
Your donations help keep the content coming and also help keep it free.

Click the DONATE button below if you would like to make a donation via PayPal.

Donate To Marine How To!

The post Programming a Balmar External Voltage Regulator appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>
Installing an Autopilot Rudder Position Sensor https://marinehowto.com/installing-an-autopilot-rudder-position-sensor/ Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:27:26 +0000 https://marinehowto.com/?p=13922 Rudder Position Sensor - Radial Drive Close Up In this picture you can see the steering systems radial drive and the Starboard shim I fabricated in order to attach the rudder position sensor to the radial drive. A rudder position sensor is really just an autopilot system transducer. [...]

The post Installing an Autopilot Rudder Position Sensor appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>

Rudder Position Sensor – Radial Drive Close Up

In this picture you can see the steering systems radial drive and the Starboard shim I fabricated in order to attach the rudder position sensor to the radial drive.

A rudder position sensor is really just an autopilot system transducer. The rudder position sensor (RPS) tells the autopilots course computer where the rudder is at all times. The RPS helps the AP’s course computer in holding an accurate course. Over the last ten or so years AP manufacturers have tried very hard to program out the RPS by adding features such as rate gyros, prediction & behavior learning software etc. etc.. Unfortunately with all this technology nothing improves AP performance like installing a rudder position sensor.

On low end price point autopilots, such as Raymarine’s wheel pilot systems, the RPS, which used to be standard equipment, is now optional. In my experience the RPS is not “optional” if you desire the best performance from your AP. For coastal cruising you can sneak by without one but your AP performance will always be better with one.

For this particular installation I chose SS tube and Starboard marine lumber. Starboard is a high modulus engineered plastic sheet product available in thicknesses to 3/4 inch. Starboard is impervious to moisture and rot and is very well suited for certain uses on a boat. It works & cuts similarly to wood and is a tremendously useful but very expensive product. For small jobs like this I always save “Starboard” end cuts or waste material from bigger jobs.

On many Edson radial drives, some folks refer to them as “quadrants” but the round ones are technically called radial drives, there are two 5/16 threaded holes already drilled and tapped into its surface for the rudder stop.

I simply measured the hole center to hole center of these 5/16 threaded holes and transferred the measurements to the Starboard shim using a set of calipers. I then drilled the two holes and mounted the ball, which is RPS’s ball & socket pivot point to the Starboard perfectly centered between the two 5/16 holes. With the ball mounted, and screwed into the Starboard shim, I then bolted the shim to the quadrant. In the picture you can see the two 5/16 bolt heads with the ball mount for the sensor in between them.

Rudder Position Sensor Base

On this particular Catalina the vessel already had a fiberglass shelf for the water heater to sit on. The shelf was perfectly level and very close to the steering quadrant. This was prefect because I the RPS ideally needed to be on the same plane, or darn close, as the quadrant. All I now needed was to come up with was a mounting bracket. The bracket for the RPS only needed to elevate the sensor, and make it level with the quadrant, simple right? Unfortunately you can’t just buy a pre-made bracket in this size. Fortunately, because of the water heater shelf, the bracket did not need to be of an odd angle, defined by the hulls shape, as can often be the case.

After considering the numerous options I decided to make a bracket out of one inch stainless steel rail / dodger tubing and two 90 degree stainless steel deck fittings. I measured for the bracket height by laying a flat edge across the quadrant and measuring from the flat edge to the the water heater shelf. I then subtracted, one half inch of total height, for the Starboard base plate the sensor would eventually be bolted to. While these fittings are costly they were a huge labor savor so in the end it was less costly to use more expensive components than to run up labor costs.

To cut the one inch stainless steel pipe I use a Rigid pipe cutter commonly used for cutting copper pipe. Rigid makes blades specifically for stainless but for just a few cuts the standard blade can work just fine.

Next I needed to attach the deck fittings to the pipe. The fittings come with set screws but I did not fully trust them in this situation. To be sure the deck fittings would not twist under a load I tightened the set screws then removed them leaving a mark on the tubing where I needed to drill two very small holes. I drilled the two holes and then re-installed the set screws. The set screws have a pointed tip and the hole was just big enough to accept 75% of this tip so they would not allow the deck fittings to twist. I used Loctite on the set screws, when re-installing them, just to make sure they would not back themselves out.

Rudder Position Sensor Radial-Drive Mount

In this photo you can see the Edson radial-drive, the shim, the RPS ball & socket & the stainless steel threaded rod connecting the RPS to the radial drive.

Rudder Position Sensor Top

This is the actual RPS and the Starboard base plate which it’s mounted to. It’s critical to the performance of the Autopilot that the sensor be installed so it’s fore / aft orientation is mounted in-line with the center-line of the hull and then bolted down in this position. It does not need to be on the center-line just aligned with it.

For this install it was easiest to line up the base and top plates before installing the set screws so I had nice 90 degree angles to work off of. Before the RPS is permanently installed you’ll need to ensure the radial-drive does not over-steer the RPS stops. If you find you’re pushing the limits of the RPS, side to side in relation to its physical allowable range of motion, simply move your pivot point closer to the rudder post. Moving the pivot point towards the rudder post will result in less throw and keep you well within the stop limits of the RPS.

If the radial drives pivot point mounting location can rotate more than the RPS can handle, it will break, plain and simple. Over turning or over throwing the RPS can be remedied by either adjusting the rudder stops, to accommodate the RPS, or by simply moving the pivot point closer to the rudder post. The latter is often the easiest.

Installing the threaded connector rod is simple but it will need to be cut to length. Always cut it slightly longer and shorten as needed. Once you cut it too short you can’t make it grow.Better to cut twice if you have to rather than ordering another rod because you cut it too short. Never cut short and always err on the large side when test fitting this piece.

Once all the hardware is installed you simply run the RPS data wire to the Autopilot control head and connect it. Depending upon how you mount it you may need to reverse the wires.

Don’t Limit Yourself

As long as the RPS is mounted firmly, does not over swing it’s capabilities, is aligned correctly with the rudder, the wiring is done properly and it’s mounted safely and in a dryish area, there is no right or wrong way to install an RPS.

On this particular radial drive I fabricated an aluminum piece that is bolted between the radial drive stop arm and the radial-drive itself. This mount moves the RPS’s pivot point closer to the rudder post in order to prevent “over-swinging” the rudder transducers capabilities. The RPS was then mounted upside down to the cockpit sole.

Another Method

For this installation a piece of G10 “L” channel and an aluminum plate were used to mount & orient the RPS to the vessel. The RPS pivot head was mounted to the underside of the tiller arm for the linear drive.

There are Many Ways to “Skin the Cat”

On this vessel it was easiest to drill, tap & mount a small piece of stainless bar stock to the quadrant and then create a bracket for the Simrad RPS.

Get Creative

When installing an RPS, feel free to think outside the box, and also try to utilize what you already have there to work with. On this boat the RPS was mounted to one of the stringers using a piece of “L” channel. The tiller arm was drilled and tapped for the RPS pivot and it was mounted inside of where the linear drives pivot point is.

Does it Need to be Level?

When fitting an RPS it’s not 100% necessary for the threaded arm to always be level. Due to the ball & socket nature of most rudder position sensors pivot points there is some allowable offset allowed between the tiller arm pivot and the RPS pivot. In this case no shimming was necessary in order to avoid binding.

Another Upside Down RPS

On this vessel it simply made more sense to use what was there and mount the RPS to the bulkhead and then to the radial drive. Mounting it to the autopilots bronze tiller arm would have been considerably more complicated.

Best RPS Installation Practices:

  • Securely mounted
  • Do not over-swing/over-rotate the RPS
  • Use materials that will hold up and be robust enough for the job
  • If drilling, bolting or screwing into a structural member or stringer, use a sealant to keep the stringer etc. dry
  • Ensure wiring and the RPS can’t be hit, damaged or disturbed by humans or gear
  • If the RPS is in a location where it may be hit build a protective cowling or box around it
  • Make sure the wiring is properly supported
  • Use nyloc nuts, lock washers or LocTite where needed

Good luck and don’t be afraid to install that critical rudder position sensor…

Let’s Keep This Site Running!

Like what you saw or read? Would you like to see more articles like this? Is so feel free to donate, support the site and keep it growing. I am trying my hardest to keep this information FREE. If you liked it, learned from it or I saved you some money feel free to make a small donation, that’s all I ask.

Click the DONATE button below if you would like to make a donation.

Donate To Marine How To!

The post Installing an Autopilot Rudder Position Sensor appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>
A Look at Inverter Inefficiencies https://marinehowto.com/a-look-at-inverter-inefficiencies/ Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:20:47 +0000 http://beneriksen.com/MHT/?p=13417 AC vs. DC Tested on a 12 Volt / 120 Volt TV For this brief article I wanted to test the total system inefficiency of using inverters when powering an LCD TV. It is stated by many companies that inverters are about 10% inefficient when converting from 12 [...]

The post A Look at Inverter Inefficiencies appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>

01 Inverter Inefficiency

AC vs. DC Tested on a 12 Volt / 120 Volt TV

For this brief article I wanted to test the total system inefficiency of using inverters when powering an LCD TV. It is stated by many companies that inverters are about 10% inefficient when converting from 12 volts DC to 120 volts AC but there is more to the story.

Inverter Efficiency:

While this 10% can be true, it is often rated when running them at max output and with inductive loads. The overall efficiency rating often fails to remain accurate when powering or charging items such as computers, tablets, phones & LCD TV’s where we run a DC>AC>DC path.

In February 2010 Practical Sailor tested eight inverters and found the actual tested efficiencies were widely varying. The eight tested inverters ranged from a low of 73% efficient to a high of 93% efficient and, as a group, had an average efficiency of about 86%. How do you know how efficient your inverter is? You’d really need to test it with the loads you are using it with.

These total DC>AC>DC efficiency losses are not all from the inverter, but stem from operating devices that run from 120 volts AC and then convert it to DC voltage inside the unit, or in the AC power cord with an in-line converter often referred to as a “wall-wort“. If your device already runs internally on DC, then running via an inverter you’re actually converting from DC to AC then back to DC again. Ouch! By going DC>AC>DC you are only adding to whatever inefficiencies your inverter already has by stacking the AC to DC wall-wart onto the equation..

Stand-By Loads:

An inverters quiescent or stand-by loads matter too and are very often completely ignored. In the Practical Sailor testing they found the lowest standby draw to be 0.6A.  This stand-by draw would results in a -14.4Ah consumption each 24 hour period.

On the high side they found an inverter that sucked current like a thirsty Vampire with a 2.24A stand-by draw. A quiescent draw of 2.24A is competing with some DC refrigeration systems and  a 2.24A stand-by load translates into -53.8Ah each 24 hour period where the inverter is just sitting there, in stand-by, waiting for an AC load. The average stand-by load of the eight inverters tested comes out to about .96A. Again how do you know your inverters quiescent draw? You measure it. When choosing an inverter, especially an inverter than “auto-transfers” the specs really need to be scrutinized.

Choose the Correct Inverter:

Please always choose & use UL rated marine inverter. This point is critically important.

ABYC-A31

“31.5.3.2 All marine power inverters shall meet the applicable requirements of UL 458, Power Converters/Inverters and Power Converter/Inverter Systems for Land Vehicles and Marine Crafts, and Supplement SA, Marine Power Converters/Inverters and Power Converter/Inverter Systems.
31.5.3.3 The frequency and voltage regulation shall comply with section 27 of UL 1248, Engine-Generator Assembly for Use in Recreational Vehicles.”

Simply meeting UL458 is not sufficient for a “marine inverter”. If you don’t understand inverters, inverter wiring and the reasons for using a marine inverter please find a tech who does.

Manufacturers such as Magnum, Victron & Mastervolt all make excellent marine rated inverters. When in doubt call the manufacturer and ask if the inverter meets UL458 as well as the marine supplemental portions of UL458.

The Testing:

To perform this test I used a 19″ Polaroid TV that was designed to run on either 12 volts or 120 volts. What I really wanted was less lab or theoretical numbers and more real world numbers derived on a boat with a device that can operate on both DC and AC, and one that would give a steady output from which to measure.This TV and vessel fit the bill.

Please be aware that not all devices, that internally run on 12V, can run on a variable 12V supply. What does that mean? It means they may do okay on 12.00V but may toast themselves when fed 14.6V. Please be sure your 12V input device can be run on a wide voltage range of at least 10.5V to 15.5V  before using it on a boats DC system fed directly off the 12V system. Not all companies spend the extra pennies on the DC input to make it capable of tolerating a variable DC input.

To be sure this TV was consuming a fixed amperage I loaded a DVD into it and then paused it at exactly the same spot in the “Elmo” disc of my daughters. For the record, I freakin detest Elmo.. (wink)

Running off 12V DC:

The on-screen shot seen here is showing the TV paused, and in this case it is running off of 12 volts DC.

Many items you would choose to use on a boat, such as an LCD TV, a tablet or a laptop computer, already run on DC internally. By using an inverter plus the “wall-wort” or AC/DC converter box, you know the little black box device that usually resides in the middle of the power cord, you are getting horrible inefficiencies because you are converting from DC to AC then back to DC again.

Many 120V devices can run on DC without using an inverter and the AC/DC wall-wort. You can simply read the output specs of the wall-wort or the input specs of the device, to determine if it is capable of being run of DC.

Current Consumption Running Direct DC

Here the TV is on pause while plugged into the boats 12 volts system.

When running the DVD, paused, on 12 volts, consumes 3.9 amps.

NOTE: I left the TV paused for over 5 minutes and the voltage & current never fluctuated. I made sure to hold ship voltage steady in all tests so as to get as accurate a data shot as I could. As voltage varies, so does current, so I used a power supply to hold battery voltage steady for all tests.

02 Inverter Inefficiency

03 Inverter Inefficiency

Running From a 2000 Watt Inverter – DC>AC>DC

This photo shows the DVD paused in almost the exact same spot though this time it’s running on 120 volts AC through a 2000 watt Freedom inverter.

Take a look at the next photo to see how inefficient it is compared to direct DC.

TV Running On A 2000 Watt Inverter

There is no trickery here and the Xantrex battery monitor is not lying.

Running this TV on 120 volts AC through a 2000 watt Freedom marine inverter uses 5.8 amps.

When compared to running this TV on direct DC the inverter + wall-wort combo is 32.8% less efficient. This is a long way from what many would assume should be a 10% inverter inefficiency.

The efficiency loss here is not just inverter. It comes from the conversions from DC to AC in the inverter, and then converting AC back to DC through the TV’s wall-wart.

This particular inverter also has a rather high quiescent draw when just sitting there doing absolutely nothing waiting for an AC load.  The quiescent draw of an inverter is often left out of conversion efficiency claims yet it also serves to impact the total daily efficiency if left in search-mode waiting for an AC load…

04 Inverter Inefficiency

05 Inverter Inefficiency

TV Running On A 400 Watt Inverter

For the next test I used a smaller 400 watt inverter. My reason for doing this test is to show that an inverter sized closer to the load can often be slightly more efficient. Of course brand and build quality have a role here too.

TV Running on a 400 Watt Inverter

Perhaps it’s not that much more efficient but 6 tenths of an amp is nothing to snub your nose at, especially if this were a device like a laptop computer that could be left running all day long.

The 400 watt inverter ran the TV using only 5.2 amps. Compared to direct DC it was a mere 25% less efficient. Again, this is a long way from the 10% stated by many inverter manufacturers, and often incorrectly believed by boat owners.

This certainly was not a critical  pinpoint accuracy scientific experiment but rather a real world look designed to show what one item, a TV, designed to run on both 120 volts AC and 12 volts DC, will consume when run both ways.

If you have the option to buy a device that will run ondirect DC, vs. 120 volts AC, you should buy it.

Inverting power from 12V DC to 120 volts AC, then back to DC again is a terribly inefficient way to power devices off your boats house bank of batteries.

When ever you can stay with direct DC and this includes cell phones, laptop computers, TV’s tablets, camera chargers & more.

 

Good luck & happy boating!

06 Inverter Inefficiency

The post A Look at Inverter Inefficiencies appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>
iPad Charging – How Much Energy? https://marinehowto.com/ipad-charging-how-much-energy/ https://marinehowto.com/ipad-charging-how-much-energy/#comments Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:40:19 +0000 http://beneriksen.com/MHT/?p=13039 400W Inverter & Apple 120V Adapter This morning I woke up to a dead iPad battery. I had to do some tax work for the business so I decided I might as well use the opportunity to connect my iPad Air to the Pentametric Battery Monitoring System and [...]

The post iPad Charging – How Much Energy? appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>

#1 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

400W Inverter & Apple 120V Adapter

This morning I woke up to a dead iPad battery. I had to do some tax work for the business so I decided I might as well use the opportunity to connect my iPad Air to the Pentametric Battery Monitoring System and track how much energy it used to charge from 0% to 100% SOC.

For this first test I chose to run the iPad through a small 400W inverter off a 12V battery bank. I chose this method because it is the most popular way I see customers charging iPads. Using a 12V to 120V inverter is not the most efficient way to charge your iPad or other small devices.

Later on in this article you will see that I also tested 0-100% charging via a 12V USB adapter. Suffice it to say it’s considerably more efficient than using the inverter.

The battery bank was LiFePO4 so the voltage remained well over 13.3V for the entire duration. This could potentially make the inverter operate a tad more efficiently, but we are talking peanuts.

For this test the iPad was asleep except for the few seconds I opened it to snap a shot of the state of charge (SOC). This may not be representative of how you use one on a boat but we charge ours at night and while they are asleep or turned off.

Specifics:

Battery Bank – 400Ah LiFePO4

Inverter – 400W Cobra MSW

iPad Power Supply – Apple 2.4A 120V to USB Adapter

Charging Cable – Apple Brand USB to Lightning

iPad – Asleep and all apps closed

Tracking Equipment – Bogart Engineering Pentametric Monitoring System With USB102 Interface

The Testing Station

I have been conducting a lot of battery testing this winter and needed my test station in my downstairs office. It makes it very convenient to have the batteries in a good constant temperature. Running a controlled temperature water-bath in my shop gets expensive to maintain a battery at 75F to 77F. Keeping my down stairs office at 75F is much easier.

The system can be set up to conduct 20 hour capacity tests on batteries, cycle testing of batteries, track solar performance and can track multiple channels for current, energy used/supplied, voltage, watt hours, battery efficiency etc. etc.. I chose to use the Pentametric from Bogart Engineering for data logging.

Today I was just curious to find out exactly much energy it takes to charge an iPad Air 3G from a 12V bank via a small MSW inverter.

#2 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

#3 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

Data Point 0% SOC @ 11:22 AM = -0.02 Ah’s

NOTE: I left the print screen capture at full screen so the computer time could be compared with iPad time. This was mainly for me to sort everything once the images were loaded. For you the reader I then cropped the full print screen capture to just the PMComm 2.0 data logging box so it was more readable. If you want to see the Ah data on the screen shot simply click the image to make it larger.

From top To Bottom:

Battery Voltage

Amps

Ampere Hours Used

Watt Hours Used

11:22 AM – 2% SOC

I snapped my first photo of the iPad at 11:22 AM and it had already gone from 0% to 2% SOC..

#4 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

#5 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

Data Point 76% SOC @ 1:58 PM = -3.91 Ah’s

For this article I decided to use the Bogart Engineering Pentametric data-logger to track the ampere hours and watt hours of energy consumption. Throughout the entire test the battery bank voltage remained at 13.3 – 13.4V.

The iPad was first charged via a 400W Cobra inverter to mimic the way I see most of my customers charging iPads, via an inverter.

In order to get to 76% SOC the iPad and inverter inefficiencies consumed -3.91 Ah’s or -51 watt hours from the battery bank.

1:58 PM – 76% SOC

After nearly 2 hours and 40 minutes of charging, at 1.5A, the iPad Air is nearing 80% state of charge.

#6 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

#7 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

Data Point 98% SOC @ 3:08 PM = -5.5 Ah’s

The iPad has approached 98% SOC and has consumed -5.5 Ah’s of battery capacity to get there.

3:08 PM – 98% SOC

This iPad Air has a 32.5 Watt Hour battery. Some older iPads had a 42.5 Watt Hour battery and can consume more energy to charge than this iPad Air model does.

iPad AIR:

If we figure the average Li battery voltage in the iPad Air is 3.6V then: 32.5Wh/3.6V = 9.03 *1000 = 9028 mAh battery (approx mAh size).

Older iPad’s:

If we figure the average Li battery voltage in the iPad 2, 3, 4 is 3.6V then: 42.5Wh/3.6V = 11.81 *1000 = 11806 mAh battery (approx mAh size).

Keep in mind that most electronics makers are not using the full range of the internal Li batteries in order to get the most life out of them. Consumers detest short battery life, especially in products where batteries are not easily replaced.

The iPad is likely using somewhere between 60% and 80% of the actual mAh capacity but this is kept under tight wrap. If Apple used the full rated capacity it would take a lot more than 5.64Ah’s to recharge the iPad Air.

#8 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

#9 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

100% SOC = -5.64 Ah

At 3:18 PM the iPad Air clicked over to 100% SOC and had consumed -5.64 Ah’s to get there. At this point I stopped the test.

IMPORTANT: It should be noted that the iPad Air does not discontinue charging when it says 100% SOC. The iPad continued drawing 0.8-0.9A for approx 40 minutes beyond where it said “100%”.

Li batteries, in devices like this, stop charging when truly full. A 100% screen display on the iPad does not necessarily mean it is totally full or done consuming charging energy. After noticing this I found that this is a fairly well known issue. It makes sense because tracking Li SOC can be extremely difficult.

Just because your screen says 100% this does not mean it is full and no longer consuming energy. When the charging icon disappears, then your iPad is fully charged.

3:18 PM – 100% SOC

While the iPad is a very efficient product it consumes more energy to charge than many boat owners would assume, especially when run through an inverter.

On a small boat with a 100Ah battery bank the iPad could use approx 11% +/- of your usable Ah capacity, when charged via a small inverter. This is of course if we assume the owner is practicing good battery management and only drawing the bank to 50% depth of discharge leaving him or her with 50 usable Ah’s..

Inverter & Apple 120V Adapter Charging Specifics:

Total Charging Time = 3:58

Average DC Current = -1.4 to -1.5A

Total Ah’s Used* = -5.64 Ah (*to when the 100% icon appeared)

If using the iPad, while charging, the current stays pretty steady at -1.5A when run through this inverter.

IMPORTANT: Many boats today have one, two, three or more iPads on-board, plus smart-phones and a laptop computer or two. The laptop computer is an energy pig by comparison. When you add all these devices up you can easily consume 20-30 Ah’s per day, if not careful.

#10 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

#11 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

TEST #2 – Charging Via 12 Volt Source

iPad Charging Test #2

For the second part of the charging observations I chose to use a USB 12V adapter as opposed to an inverter.

This particular 12V USB adapter is has an output rating of 5V and 2.0A which is 0.4A less than the output of the Apple 120V adapter. All this means is that it will take a bit longer to charge.

This one is branded Rayovac and I grabbed it at Wal*Mart to simulate what most boaters would use… The standard Apple USB to lightning cable was used with it.

CAUTION: This USB insert-charger is a piece of crap. I can literally burn one out in a weekend and this one died shortly after this testing.

USB insert-chargers are one of the highest failing devices I see on boats. It is no surprise that most I see are el-cheapo Chinese crap purchased while in the checkout line or at a convenience store.

Many 12V USB insert-chargers are not designed to meet Apple’s high current charging standard so will charge very, very slowly and usually default to 1A or less.

Not All 12V USB Chargers Are Created Equal

With the influx of cheaply made Chinese point of sale USB chargers, I call them check out line chargers, these devices have become one of the most failure prone items I see used aboard boats.

The cheaply made check out line USB chargers tend to heat up and have an extremely high failure rate. Most of these USB chargers were designed for smaller smart phones not for charging iPads or tablets. On top of that Android and Apple have different USB charging protocols and Apple does not use the USB 2.0 standard. When purchasing a USB charger be sure it’s capable of at least 2.1A, or preferably, 2.4A per USB port and designed for use with your product. Anything less is simply inadequate for charging tablets.

The current iPads require 2.4A to charge, as Apple intended them to. Don’t be fooled by products like the Blue Sea permanent mount dual USB socket charging ports. The current models only provide a total output, shared across both USB outlets, of 2.1A. Plug in two iPads and they begin to get very warm and the iPads will charge very, very slowly. Eventually they overheat and die. Blue Sea has a new 2.4A per port model coming out in the Spring of 2016.

Personally I prefer to avoid a permanent mount style as it limits you to USB charging only. If or when they fail, and they likely will, you are paying more, will need to physically re-wire the socket, and you lose the ability to use that socket for anything but USB charging.

Contrast the Blue Sea permanent mount type to the SCOSCHE USB inserts I have pictured here. The top model can charge at the full 2.4A PER USB PORT. The cost at Amazon (Jan 2016) is $11.16 with free Prime shipping vs. $20.00 plus for the Blue Sea permanent mount USB charger.

Installation of the SCOSCHE is simple, just slide-it-in to any 12V charging socket.

By using a standard 12V socket you retain the dual use of it and when, not IF, a cheap USB insert fails you simply unplug it and slide a new one in. While I generally love Blue Sea products I am not a fan of the Blue Sea fixed mount USB outlets.

#18 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

#19 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

The SCOSCHE USBC242M

The most reliable USB inserts I’ve found come from SCOSCHE, and pictured here is the USBC242M.

I have tried & murdered many 12V USB chargers as well as lived vicariously through customers failed products too. The white colored Rayovac USB charger, used in this test, died shortly afterwards.

The pictured SCOSCHE USBC242M is 12 Watts or 2.4A per port (24W – 4.8A total output) and is the one you’d want. The older model SCOSCHE was only 2.1A per port so be careful when ordering.

SCOSCHE USBC242M (LINK)

I have ordered a fair number of the SCOSCHE USBC242M for customers and not yet had a single one fail. I believe I have approx 45 of these out there, in use, without a failure to date.

My family regularly charges two iPad Air’s off just one USBC242M. We keep 4 of them on-board, three at the nav-station and one in the v-berth. We also use them in each car.

Times are always changing and I am sure there are other reliable USB chargers out there now. Look for one that offers the ability to charge your product at high speed and can deliver at least 2.4A per USB port. Buying a well known name brand seems to mean diddley squat in this product arena. Below are some of the USB charger failure brands I have encountered.

USB 12V Charger Failures:

  • Belkin
  • RCA
  • Griffin Technology
  • Rayovac
  • Anker
  • Blue Sea (dual socket permanent mount)
  • Duracell
  • No Name USB = Lots

10:06 AM 2% SOC

The first screen shot is again at 2% SOC. It appears the screen won’t even turn on until it says 2%.

#12 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

#13 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

Data Point 2% SOC @ 10:06 AM = -0.01 Ah’s

First data point from the Pentametric tracking software.

2:00 PM – 94% SOC

Oops, I got side tracked, checked when it was at 94% SOC.

#14 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

#15 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

Data Point 94% SOC @ 2:00 PM = -4.15 Ah’s

Here’s where the data begins to get interesting. It took just -4.15 Ah’s to go from 0% – 94% SOC with the 12V adapter. It’s looking very good at this point for sticking with 12V rather than inverting.

2:41 PM – 100% SOC

Sadly I missed the print screen data for 99% SOC, which occurred at 2:30 PM. It finally ticked over to 100% sometime between 2:40 & 2:41 PM as I was doing a quick screen check every minute after 99%..

#16 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

#17 iPad Charging - How Much Energy

Data Point 100% SOC @ 2:41 PM = -4.36 Ah’s

As in many other observations comparing direct 12V to inverted power one can easily see how much more efficient it is to remain DC throughout the entire charging process.

To go from 0% SOC to 100% SOC using straight DC>DC, as opposed to DC>AC>DC we saved 1.28 Ah’s of energy or 5.64 Ah – 4.36Ah = 1.28Ah’s saved.

Put another way when using the 400W inverter and Apple 120V adapter to charge this iPad it uses 29% more energy to for a complete charge cycle.

12V Charging Specifics:

Total Charge Duration = 4:41

Total Energy Consumed = -4.36 Ah

Average Current = 0.8A -1.1A

IMPORTANT: If you use a 2.4A high speed USB charger, such as the SCOSCHE USBC242M, the iPad will charge just as fast as the inverter and Apple 2.4A wall wart does. I simply chose the cheap Rayovac USB charger, for this test, because I wanted a real world snap shot and I see sub standard USB chargers being used more often than quality 12V USB chargers.

BOTTOM LINE:

If you want to charge your smart phones, tablets and iPads, as efficiently as possible, stick with DC and don’t use an inverter.

Good luck & happy boating!

Let’s Keep This Site Running!

Like what you saw or read? Would you like to see more articles like this? Is so feel free to donate, support the site and keep it growing. I am trying my hardest to keep this information FREE. If you liked it, learned from it or I saved you some money feel free to make a small donation, that’s all I ask.

Click the DONATE button below if you would like to make a donation.

Donate To Marine How To!

The post iPad Charging – How Much Energy? appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>
https://marinehowto.com/ipad-charging-how-much-energy/feed/ 1
Chart Plotter Mount For Edson Pedestals https://marinehowto.com/chart-plotter-mount-for-edson-pedestals/ Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:39:30 +0000 http://beneriksen.com/MHT/?p=12633 Simple & Symmetrical A few years ago I was asked by a customer to come up with a mount for his 7" chart plotter that: 1- Was not one of those "gawd awful looking" NavPod boxes (his words not mine). 2- Could utilize the existing 1" Edson feet and 1" [...]

The post Chart Plotter Mount For Edson Pedestals appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>

Simple & Symmetrical

A few years ago I was asked by a customer to come up with a mount for his 7″ chart plotter that:

1- Was not one of those “gawd awful looking” NavPod boxes (his words not mine).

2- Could utilize the existing 1″ Edson feet and 1″ pedestal guard top plate.

3- Was symmetrical and not off to one side.

4- That looked professional, like it came from the factory.

5- Still provide a hand hold.

6- Make the plotter easily removable.

7- Not cost an arm and a leg.

8- Kept the plotter and cables mostly out of harms way.

View From Above

I gave the idea some thought and agreed with my customer that there was a product missing for mounting a single plotter between the two legs of a 1″ pedestal guard, without an “unsightly & large” NavPod box and that did not look “cobbled” together..

This is the design I came up with and it will fit most all 4″, 5″ and 7″ chart plotters.

Since designing this mount I have been continually asked to do more and more of them. I finally decided to stop making the mounting plates on a one-off basis and now make them 10-20 at a time.

This allows me to sell them to boat owners who don’t want to take the time to make one themselves. At $58.75 it is actually a very good value when you consider your time, the tools needed, and waste material. They are all pre-cut, shaped and ready to go..

Back Side

The design is simple, symmetrical, easy to install and the wires are kept out of harms way. They are protected by the pedestal guard, the mount plate and tucked under the plotters bracket.

This is a 7″ Garmin 740S chart plotter and it fits like a glove on this Sabre 34 MKI. This is a boat with a relatively small cockpit that really can’t afford an offset pedestal guard and large NavPod box.

1″ Clamp Collars

In order to make this mount work you will need four 1″ Clamp collars. I buy them from McMaster-Carr. I’ve searched high and low for a better price, even going direct to the manufacturer but McMaster-Carr is literally selling these at about 5% over their cost.

I generally use the 316SS version but the 303/304 version will work too IF brightly polished. The 303/304 collars run about $17.00 each and the 316SS run about $32.00 each.

Either collar type will greatly benefit from polishing. They come in a mill finish which will show rust spots if not polished bright…

NOTE: McMaster-Carr links are odd and your back button may not work once you get there.  Bookmark this page before you click the links below.

1″ Clamp Collar – 303/304 Stainless PN# 6436K38 (LINK)

1″ Clamp Collar – 316 Stainless PN# 9633T19 (LINK)

NOTE: Clamp collars are always purchased based on the tube, pipe or shaft OD. So a 1″ pedestal guard gets 1″ clamp collars or a 1″ prop shaft would also get a 1″ clamp collar.

Here the four collars are shown mid-buffing…

To install the mounting plate set your bottom collar height first. Now using some long nose pliers, preferably with electrical tape on the jaws, press the top and bottom collars together while tightening the set screws. This makes for a nice stiff mount that does not wobble.

The Pedestal Guard

In many cases, but not all, you may need a new 1″ pedestal guard to clear the compass. Many OEM 1″ guards are simply too short. Edson has stopped producing 1″ straight guards, perhaps in order to sell more top plates and new feet. Certainly a nice sale $$$$$ wise for them. This design allows you to retain the top plate and your original pedestal guard feet.

NOTE: Other brand  pedestals do not use the Edson 9.5″ hole centers. Be sure you have an Edson pedestal with 9.5″ hole centers before ordering a new pedestal guard.  We offer new pedestal guards that fit an Edson pedestal in our web store;.

1″ OD X 58″ Tall Straight Pedestal Guard 316SS

The biggest problem with any of these upgrades is that many pedestals have the assembly bolts frozen into the pedestal. More than one owner has totally destroyed a steering pedestal by snapping off a SS bolt in the aluminum pedestal. This design does not require you to remove the pedestal guard top-plate and replace it.

For mocking it up in my shop I simply clamp the pedestal guard to my table saw, as shown, but a work bench will work too. This makes setting your height, installing the collars and mounting the plotter yoke to the mounting plate quite easy.

While Edson dropped the 1″ straight pedestal guard we can now offer a beautiful 1″ X 58″ tall straight pedestal guard (see link above). This pedestal guard ships tall enough to cut to the exact height you prefer. This pedestal guard is beautifully mirror polished and cost less than the now discontinued Edson guard did..

1″ OD X 58″ Tall Straight Pedestal Guard 316SS (LINK)

Cut To The Height You Want

As I mentioned the replacement pedestal guard is 58″ tall & 1″ OD. A 58″ height is pretty tall on many boats. This extra height allows you to decide just how tall you want to make it. I general find cutting 3-4″ off is the perfect height for most owners. This still allows for a good hand hold and room for the plotter to clear even a fully enclosed compass.

For cutting 1″ SS tubing I use a Ridgid pipe cutter with Ridgid stainless cutting wheel. A standard cutting wheel can certainly work to cut two SS legs but will be toast afterwards. I find a pipe cutter to make the cleanest cuts in marine SS tubing. I generally recommend buying Ridgid pipe/tube cutters because parts and cut-off wheels are always available at any plumbing supply house. I can still get parts for some of my 40+ year old Ridgid pipe cutters.

Before the Ridgid name was in Home Depot, they were the plumbers tool line of choice. Home Depot simply bought licensing rights to use the Ridgid name. Do yourself a favor and buy one at a plumbing supply house. You’ll save some money and not get the home-owner grade product.

Once the legs are cut to length be sure to de-burr the inside of the legs. I use a Dremel and grinding wheel to do this. You don’t want the guard legs to mar or slice the wires jacket or the wires themselves..

One Leg Cut

Here one leg has been cut to length and I am in the process of cutting the other leg. These close quarters Ridgid pipe cutters work well between legs if a standard cuter is too long..

De-Burr The Tube

One of my peeves is installers who install marine electronics into pedestal guards and make zero effort to de-burr the holes they’ve made, or to smooth the cut ends. Quite often I see horribly  molested wire jackets and sometimes wind up cutting myself on this sloppy workmanship. Frustrating to say the least.

Please, please, please take the time to de-burr any holes you make in the pedestal guard. This hould be done anywhere wires pass through or exit the guard.

I start with a rough rasp in a Dremel type tool..

Make It Smooth

Once the heavy lifting is done I move to a fine grade stone in the same Dremel type tool. I run my fingers over the surface to ensure there are no sharp edges that could damage the wire..

The Rotary Tool Bits

I have a pretty good collection of Dremel bits, unfortunately they are no longer in the original packaging. This means I really have no clue what the part numbers are?

Just look for bits like these and you’ll be doing well. The rasps are great for getting the big chunks off then I move to the stones a good for final surface smoothing. The round ended bit works well in small holes, as may be used for a single wire. It works well to smooth the back side of the hole inside the guard if you can’t get the angle with a straight wraps or stone.

Buff & Polish The Clamp Collars

In order to buff the clamp collars I use a buffing wheel and some Tripoli or stainless specific compound. These wheels and compounds are available at Home Depot and will fit most bench grinders. IMHO every boat owner could benefit from a buffing wheel. I use mine all the time.

I get my wheels from Grizzly and some of my compounds too.

Grizzly Buffing Wheels (LINK)

Grizzly Buffing Compounds (LINK)

Home Depot / Ryobi may be easier but the quality of the wheels from Grizzly is much better.

Buffing Compound/Rouge

Here is an example of the Home Depot / Ryobi version of Tripoli compound. It is inexpensive and works quite well.

I Clamp To Scrap Tubing For Polishing

TIP: Buffing & polishing stainless steel creates some pretty good heat and can be tough on your hands. In order to buff the clamp collars I use a scrap piece of 1″ stainless and simply clamp the collar to it. Easy, simple and cuts buffing time dramatically!

Drill The Wire Hole

Once you have decided upon the height of your mount and clamped it in place you are now ready to drill the hole for the wires.

I first drill a 1/4″ Pilot hole into the pedestal guard to center my hole saw into. For drilling a large enough hole I use Lenox Bi-Metal hole saws. They make easy work of 1″ SS.

Once the hole is drilled please be sure to do a good job at de-burring this hole. Again, for this, I use a Dremel type tool but a small round file can work too. The important thing is to have a smooth hole that won’t destroy the wire when pulling it through the guard..

TIP 1: When drilling stainless steel use a very slow drill speed, lubrication and don’t stop or pause. Stopping or pausing while the work area is hot can cause the stainless steel to work-harden. If it work hardens you’re pretty much going to go through drills like like Teddy Kennedy went though alcohol. Don’t let that happen!

TIP 2: For drilling into stainless I use drills made by Viking/Norseman. Viking/Norseman are actually the same company but go to market under two different brands, like Johnson / Evinrude did..

These drills are made here in the USA and are very good quality. One of my favorite drill sets for the boat are the Norseman/Viking 29 piece round drill index sets 1/16″ to 1/2″ in 1/64th increments.. They are in a round plastic container with screw on lid and an EXCELLENT gasket seal. The set is totally waterproof and stays closed in a tool bag, unlike metal indexes.

I use this set for 85-90% of the drilling jobs I need to do on boats. These drills also eat SS for lunch… Both Norseman and Viking offer the same sets under different part numbers. I think at last count I had three of these drill indexes.

I like them because KL Jack, a local nut & bolt wholesaler, stocks the replacement drills from Norseman/Viking and when I break one I can easily replace it with a matched drill of the same quality. The crap you get these days at Home Depot, Lowes or other retailers is pure unadulterated JUNK!

Running The Wires

You have many options here for running wires as you can use grommets, split loom or hose as I have on this one.

On this guard I ran the wires through some tubing and into the pedestal leg. For this Garmin 741 everything needed fit in a single leg of the 1″ guard. The wires included the power/data cable, Garmin network cable for radar and a NMEA 2000 drop.

Garmin 741 On a Bristol 40

This is one of the production mounting plates on a Bristol 40. The owner really liked the finished product and loved that it did not change the overall feel & aesthetics of his beautiful boat. He liked that it did not get all “gawdy looking” like he had a “40” plasma TV at the helm”.

View of Compass From Standing At Helm

You want to ensure you can see the compass from standing at the helm so adjust your height accordingly.

IMPORTANT: Installing any plotter, at the helm like this, will create some level of interference with your compass. Any time you do, you should have your compass professionally swung and a deviation card made. I’ve have yet to find a plotter that could not be swung, even magnet door plotters like those from Raymarine, Garmin, Simrad, Lowrance HDS units etc..

RANT: I believe magnetic doors on plotters are a dumb, arrogant and an ignorant move by the plotter manufacturers. It is common knowledge that your navigation compass will be close to the plotter yet they still install magnets in the chart doors. A magnet door is simply unnecessary.

COMPASS ADJUSTMENTS: For those located here in Maine Dave Witherill of Pathfinder Compass does exceptional compass work.

Laying Out A Raymarine e7D

This is a prime example of an OEM pedestal guard that was simply too short. I did not want the owner accidentally grabbing the plotter when looking for a hand hold so we opted for the taller replacement pedestal guard..

Mocking It Up In The Shop

I know most of you don’t have a spare pedestal kicking around, to do mock ups with, but with careful on-boat measurements you can easily figure and calculate your needed height. Here you can see why this factory OEM Edson guard was simply too short. The mounting plate is where I needed it to be in order to have good visibility for the compass and this left too little room for a hand hold..

You will need to measure to the top of the compass dome and then add about 4-5″ clearance between compass top and the bottom of the mounting plate. This height will vary slightly depending upon your physical height.

e7D Installed On An Ericson

This was one of the original prototypes holding a Raymarine e7D. This owner had a very, very tired pedestal and he went hog wild on an all new set up.. New complete steering pedestal, new pedestal guard, new plotter, new folding wheel, new compass etc. etc..

Side View

The original plate design was narrower but I have since made it deeper to accommodate a wider range of plotters.

Total Project Cost:

1 – Compass Marine Mounting Plate = $58.75

4 – 316 SS Clamp Collars = $142.28 ($78.96 if using 303/304SS)

1 – Replacement Pedestal Guard =  $184.52

TOTAL = HIGH RANGE $356.75

TOTAL = LOW RANGE $265.75

Cover Your Pedestal

I am continually amazed at the sheer number of sailors who don’t cover their pedestals when not in use. Any canvas maker can make you a pedestal cover that will literally pay for itself in reduced UV and water damage to your expensive pedestal and electronics. Compasses, pedestal paint & electronics are not immune to constant attack & exposure to the elements.

Pedestal covers prevent moisture ingress, limit UV damage and keep your gear out of sight, out of mind for thieves.

Let’s Keep This Site Running!

Like what you saw or read? Would you like to see more articles like this? Is so feel free to donate, support the site and keep it growing. I am trying my hardest to keep this information FREE. If you liked it, learned from it or I saved you some money feel free to make a small donation, that’s all I ask.

Click the DONATE button below if you would like to make a donation.

Donate To Marine How To!

The post Chart Plotter Mount For Edson Pedestals appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>
Balmar Smartgauge Battery Monitoring Unit https://marinehowto.com/smartgauge-battery-monitoring-unit/ https://marinehowto.com/smartgauge-battery-monitoring-unit/#comments Sun, 19 Apr 2015 22:59:02 +0000 http://beneriksen.com/MHT/?p=12290 The Balmar Smartgauge Site Plug: Please help support MarineHowTo.com by purchasing from us. MarineHowTo.com cannot remain free without reader support. This site is 100% reader supported! Shop MarineHowTo.com (LINK) PREFACE: This article is quite in-depth but much less so than it could have been. I have given a [...]

The post Balmar Smartgauge Battery Monitoring Unit appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>

01 Smart Gauge

The Balmar Smartgauge

Site Plug: Please help support MarineHowTo.com by purchasing from us. MarineHowTo.com cannot remain free without reader support. This site is 100% reader supported!
Shop MarineHowTo.com (LINK)

PREFACE:
This article is quite in-depth but much less so than it could have been. I have given a very brief overview of my actual testing procedures but enough to explain the methodology. Other than the EnerSys white paper this is the only other independent testing of this product that I know of.

Unlike EnerSys I tested new, used and even well-used marine batteries. If the product had failed my testing, this article would not be here. I don’t believe in writing articles to simply bash a product, unless of course it is a safety hazard.. The Smartgauge really surprised me and I am not easily satisfied. To be 100% honest I went into this testing with a slight bias that it would not or could not work. I was proven wrong.

Ah / Coulomb Counters:

For many years I have been a big proponent of Ah or Coulomb counting battery monitors and still am, for the right owner. These devices calculate and keep track of the current flowing into and out of a battery bank so you can attempt to keep track of SOC & Ah’s consumed, or at least get a rough approximation.

Coulomb counters give you lots of useful information; voltage, current, Ah’s consumed and SOC to name a few. Some can even give you historical data. These are nice features all packed into one compact unit. They are however not the easiest devices to program, not the easiest to wire and lose accuracy at an alarming rate, if not kept on top of.

Ah counters can be so problematic to use correctly that I had to write an entire article on installing and wiring them properly as well as a sister article to that one on proper programming. Despite both of these articles people still email me because they are confused. The Smartgauge is a simple two or three wire hook up!

Despite their complexity Ah counters have led almost every one of my customers to longer battery life, when properly used & wired. However, in some cases they have become so out of synch that they have led to erroneous readings that are simply meaningless.

Last summer I had a link 2000 reading -1100 Ah’s on a 65 Ah starting battery… (smirk) That can’t really happen now can it….? (wink)

Up until recently, this type of battery monitor was the best we had. The only other option was an ROCV reading (resting open circuit voltage) or SG measurement (specific gravity) neither of which lend themselves to prudent practical use or accuracy when actually using the vessel.

The problem with traditional Ah or Coulomb counters is keeping them accurate. As batteries age their capacity changes, the charge efficiency changes as does the Peukert’s constant. A battery is an ever moving target, so the 100Ah battery you bought three years ago may now only be a 75Ah battery.

If your battery monitor is still programmed for a 100 Ah capacity, and you are drawing 50% of the assumed Ah capacity out of it, based on this 100Ah’s, you are really drawing the bank to just 25% SOC, rather than the well accepted safe discharge level of 50%.

Follow me on this one.

  • You had 100Ah programmed into the Ah counter for a 100Ah battery
  • Your battery, due to age and use, is now 75Ah’s not 100Ah’s
  • You now draw an assumed 50% of 100Ah’s out of the battery
  • Instead of being at 50% SOC you wind up at 25% SOC
75Ah - 50Ah = 25Ah remaining or approx 25% SOC.

Now if you threw Peukert’s exponent into the mix you may actually be lower or higher depending upon the actual load at which it was drawn.

Holy cow Ah counters are confusing???? (head bonk)

This is but one example where an Ah or Coulomb counter easily and regularly become inaccurate.

A trick many of us in the industry might use is to start with a lower programmed Ah capacity than the bank is rated for. The best option is to physically test the batteries for 20 hour capacity, but this is expensive and time consuming.

For the 100Ah battery I might initially program it at 95Ah’s so the owner is never actually drawing to 50% SOC that first year (self protective feature). The next year I might remove another 3% – 5% off the capacity etc. etc.. These are just rough guesstimates, but they are never perfect. I then also count on the fact the battery bank is being drawn at average currents that are below the 20 hour rated load. This can lead to slightly more usable bank capacity, but again this gets CONFUSING for the average boater to understand any time we bring our good friend Mr. Peukert into the equation.

The only way to accurately know the actual battery capacity is to perform a physical 20 hour load test. This is complicated, time consuming, and very few boaters are willing to do this.

To be honest I don’t know of a single boater who actually has conducted an accurate 20 hour load test. Ah / Coulomb counters rely on the actual 20 hour capacity figures being accurate, to actually remain accurate, over time. No accurate 20 hour capacity figure, no reasonable accuracy in the Ah counter, only a “close enough” range. This may not be half-bad but is a a long way from accurate.

Unfortunately the scenario I laid out for a Coulomb/Ah counter is just one of the many ways these devices can become tripped up and lead to inaccurate readings. There are many more “gotcha” scenarios that can rear their ugly head, including shunt wiring mistakes, battery temperature, false re-synchs caused by solar or wind, incorrect programing etc. etc.. For the last 20+ years however, these are all we’ve had, and they are certainly better than nothing at all.

I suspect the big reason they are, and have been better, is because they make owners more aware of their bank. More awareness of your bank and charge source performance is important, and can play a larger role than we may otherwise assume.

For years I have been trouble shooting and helping owners try to use these devices in a smarter and more accurate manner. When owners understand it they can be very useful and as I said most all of my customers have had longer battery life as a result.

  • FACT: Traditional Ah / Coulomb counters become LESS ACCURATE as time goes on when related to SOC.
  • FACT: The Balmar Smartgauge gets MORE ACCURATE as time goes on for SOC

The Balmar Smartgauge is a major paradigm shift in battery SOC monitoring! Read on to find out why..

Traditional Ah Counter

This is what I refer to as a traditional Ah/Coulomb counter. In order to display the SOC correctly, as seen here, requires proper programming, battery temperature (some Ah counters offer this & some don’t), a known accurate 20 hour Ah capacity, a charge efficiency compensation and shunt wiring with no sneaker wires bypassing it.

Can Ah counters be programmed accurately? Yes they can, but certainly not to the tenth of a percent. If they are accurate today they will not be accurate three months or a year from now unless you physically program them for that.

What I am getting at is that Coulomb / Ah counters are only as accurate as you the owner make them. They are not plug and play and they do require human intervention.

BULLET POINT: Ah counters, pretty much all of them, can Coulomb count extremely accurately this is very, very simple stuff to do. Where they miss the mark is that this Ah counting rarely if ever matches your battery due to Peukert, temperature, rate of discharge etc. etc. etc..

Using The Wrong Screen For Data:

Looking at a -Ah’s screen that says -50Ah on a 100Ah rated battery tells you little to nothing about the actual SOC of the battery because;

  • The discharge current at which that -50Ah’s was drawn changes the SOC outcome
  • The battery temperature changes the SOC outcome
  • The actual capacity of the battery changes the SOC outcome

Coulomb counting and looking at only the -Ah counted/consumed screen is not the best and most accurate way to use a Coulomb counter. Programming for actual capacity, Peukert and temp or using a temp sensor, will get you the most accurate SOC readings with an Ah counter.

02 Smart Gauge

03 Smart Gauge

Peukert Effect & Ah Counting

Deep cycle lead acid batteries generally don’t like to deal with high discharge loads such as inverters, windlass motors water makers or electric winches. When you apply a discharge load above than the 20 hour Ah rating the actual usable capacity of the bank shrinks. Conversely if you consistently draw the capacity from the bank at below the 20 hour rating you will get slightly more capacity from the bank. Click the image to make it larger and see what I mean.

Deep cycle lead acid batteries, in the US, are rated at a 20 hour rating. This means a 100Ah battery can supply a 5A load for 20 hours, at 77-80F, before hitting a terminal voltage of 10.5V.

A 400Ah bank can supply a 20A load for 20 hours before hitting 10.5V. Any loads applied that are above the 20 hour rating, diminish the capacity of the bank and loads below the rated load result in slightly more usable capacity.

The 20 hour discharge rate is determined by; Ah rating ÷ by 20.

100Ah battery ÷ 20 = 5A
125Ah battery ÷ 20 = 6.25
225Ah battery÷ 20 = 11.25A

From this it is easy to see why simply looking at the Ah consumed screen of a Coulomb counter can be misleading at best. This is why an Ah counter that can correct for temp, Peukert, charge efficiency etc. will be the most accurate, when properly programmed, and the SOC screen is used.

Unless you have a consistent load that precisely matches the 20 hour rating, of your bank, and the battery is at 77F, then the Ah screen is simply not giving you an accurate representation of SOC.

Peukert:

All lead acid batteries have different Peukert constants. Some AGM batteries are as low as 1.11 and some flooded deep cycles as high as 1.50+.

Lets assume you have an Ah counter and a 100Ah bank and all you look at is the -Ah consumed screen.

The Peukert effect on two 100Ah banks at the same average 9A load:

* Bank 1 100Ah – Peukert 1.11, 9A load, 77F = Capacity at 9A Load = 94 Ah
* Bank 2 100Ah – Peukert 1.35, 9A load, 77F = Capacity at 9A Load = 81.5 Ah

If you only used the -Ah consumed screen on the 1.35 Peukert bank you would have:

* Non-Reality: -50Ah’s = “assumed” 50% SOC (100Ah – 50Ah = 50% SOC)

* Reality: -50Ah’s = 31.5% SOC not 50% SOC. (81.5Ah (9A load) – 50Ah = 31.5% SOC)

Of course your discharge load would never be a steady 9A continuously, and you would never use the entire capacity of the bank, so the numbers and examples are not precise, just as boat use related to Peukert, temp etc. is not precise. They do however give you a good idea of why proper programming, calibration and using the right screen can be the best way to use an Ah counter.

Here is another more simplistic look at it:

100 Ah Battery – Peukert 1.25:

100Ah Battery @ 80 Load = 50 Ah Capacity
100Ah Battery @ 50A Load = 56.23 Ah Capacity
100Ah Battery @ 40A Load =59.5 Ah Capacity
100Ah Battery @ 30A Load = 63.9 Ah Capacity
100Ah Battery @ 20A Load = 70.7 Ah Capacity
100Ah Battery @ 10A Load = 84 Ah Capacity
100Ah Battery @ 5A Load =100 Ah Capacity (20 Hour Discharge Rate)
100Ah Battery @ 3A Load = 113.6 Ah Capacity
100Ah Battery @ 1A Load = 149.5 Ah Capacity

I highlighted the 5A load because that is exactly what Ah capacity ÷ 20 gets you to, and where the battery is “rated”.

Peukert’s Effect =

* Discharge loads above the 20 hour rate result in less usable capacity.

* Discharge loads below the 20 hour rate result in slightly more usable capacity.

This is exactly why using the -Ah consumed screen is simply not an accurate representation of SOC.

Using the SOC screen, which has been properly programed, will result in the most accurate use of an Ah/Coulomb counter.

Are Ah counters complicated? You bet they are…. (wink)

Holy Freak Show..!!!!!

Seriously, welcome to my world. This look like someone spilled spaghetti in the battery compartment… Ouch…..

Believe it or not there is a shunt for a traditional Ah/Coulomb counter at the bottom of this picture. It’s smack dab in the middle with the two brass squares. This bank was so grossly mis-wired there was no chance in hell it could ever be close to accurate.

Traditional Ah counters rely on shunts to measure amperage flowing into or out of the bank. In reality a shunt does not measure amperage, it measures voltage drop at the mV level. The Ah counter transposes this into displayed amperage or calculates -Ah’s consumed or Ah’s returned.

The shunt in this image is a typical 500A X 50mV shunt that comes with many Ah counters. This nomenclature simply means that at 500A of current there will be a 50mV drop between the first brass square and the second brass square. A sense wire on each of the brass squares measures the mV drop or difference across the shunt. Every point in between 0A and 500A has a known calibrated value the battery monitor transposes to current.

Think of a shunt as the electric meter for your house. If you climbed the pole and ran an extension cord directly to the live wires, and then began running your fridge on it, the electric company could not charge you for the fridge use because their meter could not see this use.

Any time a wire sneaks in front of a shunt, a sneaker wire, it essentially does the same thing, it bypasses the battery monitor. With sneaker wires bypassing the Ah counter it can’t see it, so it can’t record it. Wiring shunts is not difficult but I see about 70% +/- of them wired incorrectly, even by pro’s..

With an improperly wired shunt nothing you do to program the Ah counter will make work correctly.

For simple SOC predictions you may want to consider a product like the Balmar Smartgauge. The Smartgauge uses no shunt because and is a shunt-less design. This means there are no large gauge battery lugs to crimp, no large gauge jumper wires to make up, and there is no complicated programing beyond selecting the battery type. This makes the Balmar Smartgauge a DIY’s dream battery monitor. Its easy, simple, never needs programing and stays accurate despite temperature, battery age/condition etc.. It actually gets more accurate the longer it stays connected to the bank with its learning algorithm. The weakness of the Smartgauge is its lack of Ah’s consumed or current data. For most boaters though SOC & voltage is often enough.

04 Smart Gauge

05 Smart Gauge

The Smartgauge – Simple & Effective

There’s a new Sheriff in town and his aim, and ability to hit closer to the center of the target, is better than the old Sheriff..

The Smartgauge is actually a pretty amazing tool for SoC. I am a die hard skeptic, go figure, so when new toys like this come along I need to see, touch, poke, prod, test and put them through the paces. I need to see things for myself not what the marketing guy intended for me to see.

As a result of my skepticism I just finished multiple MONTHS of testing the Smartgauge. I tested it on AGM, FLA (flooded lead acid), GEL and LiFePO4 batteries.

The Smartgauge does exactly what it says it says it does with AGM, GEL and FLA batteries.

It falls flat on its face with LiFePO4 batteries, but this was to be expected because LiFePO4 has such a flat voltage curve as to be apparently unlearn-able. I suspect if an algorithm was created specifically for LFP batteries it may eventually learn the bank, but I doubt Smartgauge will do that for such a small niche market.

PHOTO: The Smartgauge is plain & simple, it displays battery SOC for the house bank and battery voltage for an AUX bank.

Here is is showing the bank at 92% SOC. In the mindset of keep it simple voltage is displayed in 0.05V increments and SOC, displayed as “C”, from 0-100%. That is all it does, see, simple.

The difference is the Smartgauge does this quite accurately and tracks SOC regardless of temperature, battery age etc.. The longer you use the Smartgauge, and leave it connected to the bank, the more accurate it becomes.

Site Plug: In order to fund Marine How To there are certain products I use personally or we install for paying customers that I choose to share with our readers in the Marine How To Web Store. I sell these products at the most competitive prices we can in order to re-invest into this site to keep the content free. The Balmar Smartgauge is one of those products. If you think you want a Smartgauge please support Marine How To and purchase it from the Marine How To Web Store.

Simplicity

When Balmar introduced the UK developed Smartgauge to the US market I was pretty excited. I had tried to buy one two years ago but my emails went unanswered so I filed it under the scam & snake oil folder in my mental filing cabinet.

I had literally forgotten about the Smartgauge until Rick Jones of Balmar approached me at the Annapolis show to tell me they had added it to their product line and were now the US distributors. Even though I implicitly trust Rick and the guys at Balmar, the claims still seemed too good to be true. Why had no one been able to do this before?

To make a long story short I tracked down an inside contact at EnerSys (name withheld) to see if I could get my hands on the white paper so often referenced by Smartgauge.

EnerSys are the makers/inventors of TPPL AGM technology sold under the Odyssey & Die Hard Platinum brand for marine use and they are the inventors of the Optima spiral wound batteries (which has been sold off). EnerSys however is much larger than their presence in the marine market and much of their business is in large standby/UPS systems and military use. Because EnerSys has no financial ties to Smartgauge I found their white paper to be a breath of fresh air in a credible independent test data manner. I don’t believe EnerSys allows Smartgauge to use that white paper, and I was asked not to reproduce it, so have only taken excerpts from it.

“But RC how does it work?”

You’ve got me..? I have no idea how it actually works, at least at the detail level programing/algorithm level (proprietary stuff), but it is designed to track voltage in a very unique manner and then compare these readings to an internal database and other measures to keep it on-point. Many internet posters have assumed, posited and suggested, that it checks internal resistance and pulses across the battery etc.. It may actually do this. In our lab I’ve have not seen evidence of this on the power / volt sensing wires, even with an Oscilloscope. However the oscilloscope we have is not a tracking or data-logging version. If it only pulsed the battery once or twice per day we would have missed it unless glued to the screen for hours.

The Smartgauge tracks voltage, up to 1500 times per second. This tracking speed allows it to detect trends and compare it to internally programed data models. The Smartgauge does use computer modeling, of actual batteries, and then feeds this data into an algorithm that can “learn” the bank as time goes on. This modeling must have been time intensive to get to this level of accuracy  and this sort of programing minutia. All I can say is that over time it seems to adapt to learn your bank and give significantly more accurate SoC readings than an Ah/Coulomb counter can, as programmed and used by the average installer or boat owner, especially when the owner starts partial state of charge cycling.

How the Smartgauge actually does what it does, at the detail level, is as closely a guarded a secret as the Frosted Flakes recipe that Tony the Tiger protects.

The best overview I can give, on the Smartgauge level of accuracy, is the executive summary of findings by EnerSys.

QUOTE = EnerSys White Paper

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SmartGauge® is a Battery Monitoring Unit (BMU) that is intended to be fitted within military vehicles and to provide crucial information to vehicle commanders, such as State of Health (SoH), State of Charge (SoC) and the time remaining they have available to continue operation until battery power runs out.

The working partnership between EnerSys and SmartGauge® has resulted in EnerSys testing the SmartGauge® BMU whilst connected to a Thin Plate Pure Lead (TPPL) battery type within its electrical laboratory at Newport South Wales, to evaluate the performance and accuracy of its data.

The SmartGauge® BMU was tested using a 12V 100Ah TPPL battery which was subjected to a 100% depth of discharge test, followed by a full 12 hour recharge. This cycle was repeated continuously until the battery reached 80% of its rated capacity, the SmartGauge® BMU and EnerSys laboratory data logging equipment (Digatron) continuously monitored the voltage, current, time and from which the State of Charge and State of Health was calculated.

The correlation of State of Charge (SoC) and State of Health (SoH) between the BMU data and Digatron Data was excellent with insignificant variance between the two readings based upon resolution increments of 1%.”

06 Smart Gauge

07 Smart Gauge

The Testing Station

We don’t own a six figure Digatron like EnerSys does, so this test station had to suffice for the best accuracy we could do.

Test Bench:

  • Charging – Mastech 3050EX & BK Precision 1900
  • Charging – 80W Solar Panel – Rogue MPPT 3048
  • Ah Counting – Victron BMV-602, Array DC Load Center, PentaMetric Data Logger
  • Discharging – Array 3721A 40A DC Electronic Load & 400W Inverter
  • Data Logging – PentaMetric Multi-Input Ah/Coulomb Counter & USB Interface
  • Misc. – Fluke 179 DVM (NIST Calibrated)

TEST METHODOLOGY:

#1   Determine actual 20 hour capacity for each of the batteries tested through 20 hour discharge capacity testing. Both used and new batteries were tested. New batteries do not deliver full rated capacity, until broken in, so as-is condition for 20 hour Ah capacity had to be determined.

#2   Program Ah counters with the new 20 hour capacity and run load tests side by side with the Smartgauge.

#3   Test Smartgauge for accuracy during charging & discharging events, including solar, inverter loads and DC loads. Batteries were determined full when charge current fell to less than .5% of Ah capacity at target absorption voltage. (absorption charging voltages varied by battery type).

#4  Control room temperature to 75F to remove the temperature equations from the test calculations. (77F was just too damn hot). Part way through I added a temp controlled water bath to more accurately maintain battery temp, and keep my room a bit cooler.

#5   Re-test batteries for physical Ah capacity at the end of testing to note if changes were noted or the batteries declined in capacity during testing. Two batteries actually increased Ah capacity by approx 4% (new flooded batteries not yet “broken in”) and the rest were under 1% changes or well within my range of error resolution to even calculate.

#6   All used batteries were equalized and serviced before being put into testing.

NOTE: This testing took approximately four months to complete. This is not quick or easy work if you want to get accuracy as close as you can for the equipment you have on hand. It was a real eye opener as to how inaccurate traditional Ah counters can be, in regards to SOC.

Test Procedure

In order to determine the if the SoC of the Smartgauge was correct I first had to accurately determine the Ah capacity of the batteries I was testing. I tested both new and used batteries to see how the Smartgauge would adapt to being inserted into a system with used batteries.. One flooded battery was seven years old.

The 20 Hour Capacity Test:

When conducting these tests the discharge load needed to be constant over the duration of each test. This is difficult if you don’t have the proper equipment because the voltage decays or decreases, as SoC declines. Due to this the discharge current changes due to Ohm’s law. As a result of this testing I now have a beautiful lab grade DC constant-load tester that will hold current precisely where you set it and then disconnect the bank when it hits 10.5V. This made this testing much easier, and more accurate.

Determining Ah Capacity On Used Batteries:

In order to compare the Smartgauge, to the two Ah counters, I had to first determine the batteries physical, at this point in time, 20 hour rating. This sometimes involved three complete discharge capacity tests all the way to 10.5V.

* First Capacity Test:
Load applied at labeled 20 hour rate and Ah’s delivered were recorded. If the battery did not have the labeled capacity I noted the Ah’s it supplied transferred that Ah capacity to the second test.

* Second Capacity Test:
For simplicity’s sake lets assume we had a 100Ah battery that only delivered 77Ah’s. The first test was at 5A/77F until the bank hit 10.5V. But, if the bank hit 10.5V at only 77Ah’s delivered, I then recalculated the test based on 80Ah’s. This is a small fudge factor I learned while performing these tests. What I wanted to do was come up with a new 20 hour rate for the battery in its current condition. I needed to identify a discharge rate that would allow the battery to run for 20 hours at 77F. If I figured I had an 80Ah bank then 80Ah’s ÷ 20 = 4A load. The second test was then run at 4A and the Ah’s delivered were recorded to see if it ran for 20 hours. If it matched, and it ran for 20 hours,  then no third test was needed.

* Third Capacity Test:
If Ah capacity did not match on the second test I then recalculated and performed a third test. I never had to go beyond a third test and was usually within .5 – 1 Ah. Close enough for this testing and far more accurate than any boater would ever program for on-board with a traditional Ah counter, unless they got very, very lucky.

After each capacity test the battery was immediately, and slowly, recharged at the new 20 hour rate. This recharging was done at constant current until voltage was at 16.0V (not for the GEL or AGM). This was constant-current (CC) only charging with no voltage limit (well technically 17V). It required my attention near the top end of charge and added many days to these tests because to recharge after the 20 hour capacity test took over 20 hours. This is over 40 hours of testing for each capacity test completed.

This type of discharge/recharge is often referred to as a reforming charge. It can tend to put some capacity back into the bank and can help minimize the abuse of taking the battery to 10.5V to find actual capacity. Tedious and time consuming though.

BULLET POINT: It should be noted that only one lead acid battery I tested produced the rated Ah capacity, a new AGM. None of the others did, not a single one.. (Head-Bang) New batteries take many cycles to fully break in and deliver rated capacity and used batteries lose capacity over time. During testing some of the new batteries slightly increased capacity, and some used batteries lost a 1% or so. Ah capacity on lead acid is an ever moving target. If you think your Ah counter is giving you accurate SOC data consider this bullet point and what it took me to find the actual, at this point in time, Ah capacity of these batteries. The only batteries tested, that delivered their ratings, were the LiFePO4 and one AGM..

PHOTO: This photo just represents the screen I have on the PentaMetric data logger. I can change the screen display to add up to three shunts and three voltage sources. I normally use this tool to track solar performance and do A/B comparisons but it is great for data like this too…

Ah’s were tracked simultaneously with both the PentaMetric and the Victron BMV-602 as well as the Array 3721 for discharging.

08 Smart Gauge

Smartgauge Wiring

Remember when I said easy? This is it. You run a duplex 14GA wire to the house bank cross-connecting it as shown. Place the negative on one end of the bank and and the fused positive on the other end of the bank. For the start battery voltage a single 14GA wire goes to the B2 terminal.

IMPORTANT: Do not wire the Smartgauge to any place other than the actual physical battery terminals.  In order for the Smartgauge to work accurately the positive & negative leads from the Smartgauge need to attach directly to the physical battery terminals, not a positive or negative bus, or anywhere other than the actual battery terminals.

The Smartgauge’s negative and positive and battery bank system take off positive and negative points must be wired as shown in this diagram. The Smartgauge and system wiring must not simply pull from an end battery of a parallel bank. Negatives off one end and positives off the other end.

WARNING: The Balmar Manual is actually incorrect on how it shows the Smartgauge to be connected, this happens. Please use the connection method shown here if you want optimal accuracy.

Even if you have a traditional battery monitor you need to bypass the shunt and wire the neg to the neg battery terminal. The consumption draw/load of the Smartgauge is so small a traditional Ah counter shunt can’t even accurately see it or count it. The Smartgauge will however track its own miniscule consumption, over time, even when a traditional Ah counter can not.

The Smartgauge self consumption is less than 5mA (0.005A) when the display is asleep and just 15mA (0.015A)when the display is lit.

In 24 hours the Smartgauge consumes only 0.12Ah. In an entire week it consumes just .84Ah.

Bullet Point: A traditional battery monitor, using a 500A/50mV shunt, does not have the resolution to track the consumption of the Smartgauge.

Because the Smartgauge tracks voltage, not Ah’s, it can actually track its own self consumption. The self consumption of the Smartgauge can actually be less than a flooded batteries own self discharge in warm weather.

EGREGIOUS WEB SITE PLUG:
Please remember this FREE web site is 100% supported by you my readers. I do not have annoying advertising or charge a membership fee. I try very hard to keep this site FREE but it is becoming harder and harder to do. Help grow and support this site by making a donation:

Donate

I have also added some products to the site to help support it. You can actually  buy the Smartgauge right here on this site. Remember where you read and learned about this product if you choose to buy one.

If you like this resource please do your part to help support it and keep it growing.

Smartgauge Terminals

Wiring:

GND = House Bank Negative Terminal
B1+ = House Bank Positive Terminal (FUSED within 7″ of battery bank)
B2+ = Start/AUX Battery Positive Terminal

Relay / Alarm Connections:

The Smartgauge also has the ability to drive external relays, alarms etc.. There are many uses for the relay ports and it offers many programing choices for the relay driving terminals.

NO = Normally Open Relay Terminal
COM = Neg Relay Terminal
NC = Normally Closed Relay Terminal

IMPORTANT NOTE: The max permissible load on any of the relay terminals is 500mA or 0.5A. If you need to drive more current, an external relay/contactor, with coil loads under 500mA, needs to be used. The maximum voltage across any of the alarm terminals is 48V…

10 Smart Gauge

Wire Gauge Confusion

There is a lot of confusion around which size wire to use when installing the Smartgauge. The actual manufacturer states that 18AWG is a bare minimum for wiring the Smartgauge. They also say that bigger is always better and originally indicated to Balmar that 14AWG should be used. As can be seen in the screen shot of the original Smartgauge manual.

Early Smartgauge manuals suggested 14AWG as seen in this image. 14AWG is what we at Compass Marine Inc. have used on every single Smartgauge installation. Typical of many manufacturers edits to manuals get made or they are not as clearly researched as they should have been by the individual making the edits.. On the hard drive here, we have no less than three Smartgauge manuals one suggesting 14AWG, one suggesting 16AWG and yet another suggesting 18AWG.

18AWG is the bare minimum. 16AWG is a happy medium and meets ABYC standards and 14AWG is even better and it fits near perfectly into the terminals.

11 Smart Gauge

The Results

In this image I am testing the Smartgauge with a 400Ah LiFeP04 battery bank. This is the only type of battery it failed to track accurately. Not a big deal as it was never designed for Li-Ion batteries and very few boat owners use LiFePo4 at this point in time.

I found it quite interesting that, while trying to find the actual capacity of some of the used lead acid batteries, the Smartgauge was already accurate by the second cycle and I was on my third complete discharge capacity test before finding an accurate new 20 hour rating for the battery to test it.

How accurate? It is tough to say precisely because I really don’t know how much I trust the Ah counters. Suffice it to say it was most likely as accurate as the Ah counters and probably below a 3% variation in SoC. I don’t have the test equipment resolution to make claims of 1% like EnerSys does, but even if under 5% this is simply outstanding.

The Smartgauge was lining up with the Ah counters, once the banks were well calibrated to the Ah counters (arghh what a process), to under a 2% – 3% variance. In many cases the Smartgauge beat me to the actual SOC. The Smartgauge found the SOC of the used batteries faster than I could by conducting actual physical 20 hour capacity tests. This is truly amazing.

The Smartgauge seems to work as advertised on GEL, AGM and FLA batteries in discharge mode.

What does that mean?

It means that I did see the Smartgauge get a bit confused when the bank was being charged. It can’t really track the capacity of a battery charger now can it…? However we are only talking about 10-12% variation from the Ah counters during charging, and not a huge deal when you consider how simple this battery monitoring unit is. Another issue with tracking SoC during charging is charge efficiency variations, so it was much easier to do this testing on the discharge side of the equation.

As soon as the charge source was discontinued, the Smartgauge fairly quickly identified the accurate SoC of the bank, and was back within approx 2% – 3% of the two painstakingly calibrated Ah counters.

WHAT THE SMARTGAUGE DOES:

  1. It tracks the voltage of the battery bank up to 1500 times per second and over time learns bank behavior, with no human intervention & no complicated programming. As time goes on it gets more and more accurate. This is good!
  2. It needs a good three to four deep-cycles for it to hone in on SoC. The longer it remains connected the more accurate it gets. I attempted 5-8 cycles on each bank beyond the capacity tests.
  3.  It provides voltage of the HOUSE and START/AUX banks in 0.05V increments.
  4.  It identifies SoC of the HOUSE bank irrespective of age or condition.
  5.  It requires no programing beyond selecting the battery type and wiring it directly to the battery positive and negative terminals of the HOUSE bank.
  6.  It removes the guess work and tediousness of programing a traditional Ah counter.
  7.  It is the easiest to use battery monitoring unit I have ever used or installed.
  8.  It works with either 12V or 24V banks and automatically detects this when connected.
  9.  It offers low and high voltage alarm relay trigger ports. These ports can even be used to start a generator, if your vessel is so equipped.
  10.  It requires no shunts or heavy gauge wiring and installs with simple 14GA wire. No battery lugs to crimp.
  11.  It tells you all you really want or need to know in order to maximize your battery banks cycle life, the state of charge. It really does not matter what your capacity is just that what ever it is, you are not constantly pulling the bank below 50% SoC.

Pro’s & Cons

Pro’s:

  • Easiest to use of any battery monitoring device
  • Easiest to wire of any battery monitoring device
  • Lifetime accuracy with no reprogramming
  • Simple – SoC is really all you need to know
  • Accurate – More accurate than an Ah counter
  • Can track its own very small self consumption
  • Offers alarm or gen start relay ports in both normally open and normally closed
  • No human intervention beyond selecting the battery type
  • Very low self consumption
  • Truly a plug & play battery monitoring unit
  • Can track miniscule parasitic leaks / loads that shunt based devices can miss

Con’s

  • Non standard hole cut out / display size
     Face Plate = 4 3/8" X 3"
     Cut Out = 3 3/4" X 2 1/2"
     Rear Clearance = 1" plus wires
  • No amperage display (some owners like this)
  • Not as pin point accurate during charging as it is when discharging
  • Price – More money than some Ah counters but less than many others

MarineHowTo.com Overall Rating = TWO THUMBS UP!!!

If I had three thumbs this product would get all three! The sheer simplicity and accuracy of this product are outstanding and I really did doubt it, I was proven wrong…
What matters most to your batteries is your depth of discharge or state of charge. The Balmar Smartgauge does this accurately and simply! Hands down the Smartgauge is the easiest SoC meter we know of.

Good luck & happy boating!!

12 Smart Gauge

Let’s Keep This Site Running!

Like what you saw or read? Would you like to see more articles like this? Is so feel free to donate, support the site and keep it growing. I am trying my hardest to keep this information FREE. If you liked it, learned from it or I saved you some money feel free to make a small donation, that’s all I ask.

Click the DONATE button below if you would like to make a donation.

Donate To Marine How To!

The post Balmar Smartgauge Battery Monitoring Unit appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>
https://marinehowto.com/smartgauge-battery-monitoring-unit/feed/ 1
Nav Pod Installation Tips https://marinehowto.com/nav-pod-installation-tips/ Wed, 04 Mar 2015 03:18:12 +0000 http://beneriksen.com/MHT/?p=11553 Heavy Duty Card Stock Templates It occurred to me, after seeing a guy at the boat yard destroy a $200.00 + NavPod, that some may benefit from tricks I've learned on how to handle drilling and mounting instruments to them. TIP:  If they offer a pre-cut NavPod for [...]

The post Nav Pod Installation Tips appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>

01HeavyDutyCardStockTemplates

Heavy Duty Card Stock Templates

It occurred to me, after seeing a guy at the boat yard destroy a $200.00 + NavPod, that some may benefit from tricks I’ve learned on how to handle drilling and mounting instruments to them.

TIP:  If they offer a pre-cut NavPod for your instrument BUY IT!  Do not cheap out on this and try to cut it yourself, if it can be avoided. NavPods are made of a plastic and plastic is inherently finicky to drill and cut into especially when tolerances for instrument bezels need to be very precise. Here are some tips that will help.

Step #1 Print your template from the manufacturers web site being sure to have your printer NOT using the “scale to fit paper setting“. If your template is too big bring it to Staples or Kinko’s and have it photo copied onto heavy weight card stock. Always be sure measure the hole centers after you print out a template to double check the proper scaling and to ensure the proper template size.

Step #2 Use a heavy weight card stock for the template! I can not stress this enough it is very important that you use a heavy weight paper as it will not get twisted up in the drill, hole saw or jig saw.

Brad Point Drill Hits The X

Step #3 Center, align and securely tape your template, after trimming to size, to the face of the NavPod.

Step #4 Use only BRAD POINT DRILLS. Black & Decker “Bullet Point” drills, or similar, are not brad point drills and do not work nearly as well. Brad point drills have a very sharp center tip and also make very clean cuts at the outer edge of the hole. One tip to make the cut even smoother is to cut through the outer layer of NavPod with the drill running in reverse.

If you don’t have brad points please do yourself favor and buy them. Many instruments, such as some of the Garmin plotters, require VERY, VERY precise holes. A drill that wanders even a 1/32nd or 1/64th of an inch can make a real mess and potentially ruin a $300.00 pod. On Garmin 3200 series plotters you have 1/16 of an inch variance before you’ve ruined the NavPod..

02BradPointDrillHitsTheX

03DirtyHole=StartedInForward

Dirty Hole = Started In Forward

Step #5 Always start the drill and or the hole saw in reverse then switch to forward once through the surface skin and through the template. You’ll thank me for this tip when drilling through gelcoat as well.

This dirty hole is rough and tore the paper because the drill was started in forward..

Clean Hole = Started In Reverse

Here is the same diameter hole made using the same brad point bit only this time I started the cut with the drill in reverse direction not forward. You’ll notice that it did not even tear the paper. If it can make this clean of a cut in paper it will make a very, very clean cut in the surface of your NavPod or gelcoat or teak or what ever surface you decide need a hole in it.

Step#6 When using a hole saw pre-drill the arbor hole using a 1/4″ brad point drill first. This will ensure your hole is perfectly centered over the X on the template and that the instrument hole will line up with the mounting screw holes.Most all hole saw arbors use a 1/4″ bit whether it’s a Starrett or a Lennox but do confirm your hole saws arbor bit size first.

Step #7 When using a hole saw, like you’ll need for mounting Raymarine ST-60 type instruments, start in reverse then switch to forward. This will give a nice clean entry with no chipping of the plastic.

Step #8 Use the absolute slowest speed your tool will run. If the plastic begins to melt stop, let it cool, and then start again. I use my air compressor to blow the chips away as I cut and to keep it cool too. It took about 5 minutes to rig the set up so that it would automatically blow where I was cutting. If you have an air compressor this may be worth while. A simple 3.5″ hole may take as long as 15 minutes to cut while trying to prevent melting of the plastic. Patience is a virtue..

04CleanHole=StartedInReverse

05AccurateBoschLeftSloppyRyobiRight

Accurate Bosch (Left) / Sloppy Ryobi (Right)

Step #9  When using a jig saw tape the entire face of the NavPod with blue tape to prevent marring of the surface. Also use a high quality jig saw such as a Bosch. While I’m as big a fan of inexpensive tools as anyone this is no place for a low grade jig saw.

I would not ever consider using my Ryobi (pictured on right) to perform this task as it is too far from accurate. Poor quality tools can make or break a project.

Bosch Clean Cut Blades

Step #10 Use the right blades for your jig saw. I use these Bosch “Clean Cut” blades and they make beautiful clean cuts and don’t even rip the paper template. If they can cut paper cleanly….

06BoschCleanCutBlades

07NoNon-MarBaseVsMetalSCratchProneBase

Protective Base vs. a Metal Scratch Prone Base

Here’s a photo of the non-mar base that comes with the Bosch jig saw. Even with this plastic cover I still tape what ever surface I’m cutting with blue easy release masking tape. I’ve had my Ryobi actually rip the tape but that has never happened with the plastic non-mar Bosch base..

The Finished Result

By using the right tools, for the right job, your finished result will work, look and perform as intended. Both of these pods required custom cutting and mounting.

Be patient, use the right tools and techniques and the project will go smoothly.

 

Good luck & happy boating!

08TheFinishedResult

The post Nav Pod Installation Tips appeared first on Marine How To.

]]>